Fundamental right. Consumers today are typically required to waive all sorts of rights, including the right to seek our Justice System, and the right to even speak. What is happening is obvious. Through the use of indecipherable language and nonnegotiable contracts, corporations have successfully strip consumers of the seventh amendment right. Why should we be surprised when corporations what to do the same to consumers First Amendment right . Deemed would have been unconscionable and unenforceable. Surely, there is no consent by the consumer. Surely it was on constable it was [indiscernible] congress should pass a bill that prohibits gag causes. Simply, these gag causes attack the very heart of affair and functioning american marketplace by considering prohibiting few bursts consumers prohibiting consumers. Consumer Protection Laws in a free economy protect the market itself and all its participants. They have recognized this on countless occasions. Created withere the understanding t
Internationally respected. It had been in the Health Insurance business until the 90s when they sold off the health plan to humana. So with their credibility and their experience and expertise, i was hopeful and optimistic that we would be successful. In hindsight, it was too much into short. Of time. Plus all of the other problems described. Another five minutes. This is what i was talking about in my opening statement. The aca started in 2010. Then these coops started a couple years later, he had a couple years to get going. It was not like we were trying to stand up 22 companies all at the same time we were doing the enrollment on the website and all that. This was staggered, is that right, mr. Morrison . Yes or no will work. Mr. Morrison the awarding of the loans was staggered. That is true. So really, part of the problem is that there was no support as it went along. With that be a Fair Assessment . That is kind of what i want to talk about. The coop was initially conceived as a g
Around 0 00. Learning more about how police and the trio of suspects to the murder of canadian visitor audrey carry where they reportedly got a weapon. Pam of 23 yearold audrey found in a wooded area not far from Golden Gate Park saturday First Official said she died of Blunt Force Trauma now revealing she was shot in the head Police Believe the murder weapon as the same gun used to kill 67 year old Patrick Steve carter in fairfax monday carter found shot a number of times with his doberman pincher also shot still leashed to him Police Believe the motive and both carry cutters that is the same. Believe robert was double killing. For and find out if this was an anomaly. Pam is was seized by police during the rest of the three suspects wednesday. By police in portland oregon. Inside the car of their alleged second victim steve carter. Also inside that car camping gear police they belong to the first victim audrey. Police say the other piece of evidence that links the murders a gun found
Morrison lampley, and 18year old lila alligood. The two shootings were connected and they say they have the physical evidence to prove it. And died from the gun shot wounds and just that there were two similarities at a time, location, and manner. Reporter police say that the gun was used in both killings and that it was stolen from a car parked in a residential area some time overnight on september 30. Now, carey from the province of quebec was on a solo camping trip. Camping out at the park. Found face down on saturday. The day after the bluegrass would have kicked off. Discovered on monday on the marine county trail. Now carter has been in ma rine, really just a tragic story all the way around. Back to you. Well we could talk about the motives here. Was it robbery or Something Else . Something more . Reporter as difficult as it may be for us to swallow that it sounds unfat un unfathomable that someone would kill for camping gear and a car. If you look at the timeline, the first murd
Good morning. The Judiciary Committee will come to order and without objection the chair is authorized to declare recesses of the committee at any time. Welcome everyone to this mornings legislative hearing on h. R. 699 the email privacy act and i will begin by recognizing myself for an opening statement. Todays hearing examines h. R. 699 the email privacy act and the need to modernize the electronic indications privacy act and in enacting it 30 years ago Congress Declared that the laws purpose was to achieve a fair balance between the privacy expectations of american citizens in the legitimate needs of law and fortunes and First Nations is bigger for First Nations these piriformis decades old outdated law has been a priority as chairman of the committee not to working with members of Congress Advocacy groups on Law Enforcement for years on many complicated nuances involved in updating this law. Im i am pleased to now hold this important hearing to examine the leading reform proposals