I dont think theres anything brazenly irresponsible about advocating for us having a deterrent to nuclear war. What the purpose of my remarks was, we need to make it clear to our adversaries, russia in particular, if we use Nuclear Weapon, he will pay an enormous price for it. I cant believe the gentle lady as opposed to that. The goal of all of this is to stop anybody from thinking they under any circumstances, to have a good outcome for them. My point on the deterrence is the russians will launch the low yield and if they dont have one they know we wont do anything because we wont want to be disproportional. It implies a low yield nuke. If this is launched. It will set off and instructive war. We want to discourage them from thinking about launching it. In that regard, nothing wrong with making it clear to our adversaries you launch Nuclear Weapon we will consider nuclear war. We have all the options on the table. I will point out as Mister Cooper pointed out we have a low yield Nucl
Reach a bipartisan agreement on the Strategic Forces subcommittee mark and that was a sad day for us on that subcommittee. My amendment would restore the authority of the department of defense to deploy the low yield variant of the w 762 warhead. Our deterrence requires that the United States have a proportional response available for any miscalculation. Low yield weapons are critical to our security because they give us a credible deterrent. Russias confidence that if they were to strike us we would have the capability and the will to respond in a proportional manners makes a strike by the russians less likely not more likely. Mr. Chairman, this is why the 2018 Nuclear Posture review included the requirement that the United States develop and deploy the low yield submarine launched Ballistic Missile as soon as possible. The npr highlighted how critical this capability is to close the deterrence gap and provide credible Response Options to russia to deescalate doctrine. There was an im
If theyre the only ones to do with it they will experience incredible victory in 2016 in the lakes three have not seen since they age of ronald reagan. That is a new kind of conservatism . Yes. Mitt is a compassionate conservatism but to say what is it our own hearts read of the day qualifier. But as we really understand it with the dignity of work and the sanctity of every individual as a child of god host how are we so far off that path . It is anger and protests i a understand that people are so worried about the lawlessness in the chaos that day lash out to celebrate and follow somebody like donald trump and i understand that but that is not the right reaction. Menu feel like lashing out is when you have to be most in control. Host also true with the Progressive Side going to Elizabeth Warren . Yes. Someone like donald trump is great for the media you never know what will come out of his mouth. [laughter] but the 73 yearold socialist out interesting can that be . But the left is mo
Try to discuss chinese behavior as more assertive. I think the taiwanese perception or analysis about the extra motivations behavior of china, whether it has become more assertive or a transitional period of a new status as a major power or whether its the individual leadership or whether its a certain role played by citizens. More discussions in taiwan if you want to put in the context about cheneys behavior. With that, we please join me and thinking professor tsekang leng. [applause] and thank you all for coming very much. [inaudible conversations] [inaudible conversations] saturday march the 10th 10th anniversary of hurricane katrina. Today we feature pulitzer prizewinning journalist Ronnie Greene on his boat, tranfour it examines the case of six unarmed citizens shot after in katrina. They told us they would take us to shelters where they could get help and get the seniors to help good they loaded us up on this military trucks. Then they declared the city of new orleans and Jeffers
Friend from california said this amendment kills this bill, doesnt kill anything. The only thing it does assess look at it on the road if its not working, will stop it. Whatever we all like to be able to stop it if its not working . This is a prime opportunity to be able to stop and fix it. He also said the difference between those of us on the side and those on the other side is on the side, we believe this is legislation that will work. Its Important Committee and we have smart people here. We dont have to rely on what we believe, we can get the data, we can get the facts, when get the true facts and base our arguments and legislation in good, solid data. If you do that theres some things you can glean from this. This bill is 2. 3 trillion to the national debt. If this happens it will hurt the local government, and the people that we represent. Well have to come back and look at cuts from infrastructure, crime, opiates, to medicare. That doesnt help anybody that we represent. The fac