There some clear requirements about the operational planning about the strategic planning, and that planning will have to be drive the budget priorities, we fully intend to Parks Alliance two Oldest Department accountable and work with them closely on the development of those operational plans and how those operational plans translate into budget priorities. I think they will do that. I think that committed to us that they will do that. I think they want to do that for themselves. I think this really can usher in a new era for us much smarter and effective park policy. Thank you. Thank you very much for are there any other members of the public would like to comment on item number two . Seeing none, will close Public Comments. [gavel] commissioner farrell thank you everyone who came out today to speak on this measure. And to our rec center part and Parks Alliance and other members working on this for quite some time now. We look forward to the continuing discussions. Again want to thin
The control must provide the background to this is the Library System has the exact same funding arrangement being proposed for the park and existing 75 fund from property tax and a baseline funding from the discretionary general fund. But the library has specified Spending Priorities for the setaside money in the charter. They must specified use of the unspent setaside fund at years end. The controller is required to calculate and publish the actual amount of city money for the library. We would like the same words to be inserted into this. The addendum is from proposition d. Further information 2007 the Library Preservation Fund Amendment to charter provided as example of specificity. Thank you. Good morning. Im nancy wilson can form a member of the yet im deeply concerned voters will not be getting the maintenance for our parks that is been promised to them with this new Charter Amendment. Unless the requirements tackle the problems are specified in the legal language. Big state tha
Respectfully exercise my fifth amendment right and decline to answer that question. Ms. Lerner, in june, 2011, you requested that holly pawes obtain a copy of the tax exempt application filed by crossroads g. P. S. So that your senior technical advisor, judy kindell, could review it and summarize the issues for you. Ms. Lerner, why did you want to personally order that they pull crossroads g. P. S. , karl roves organizations application. On the advice of my counsel i respectfully exercise my fifth amendment right and decline to answer that question. Ms. Lerner in june of 2012, you were part of an email exchange that appeared to be about writing new regulations on political speech for 501c4 groups and in trent sis your quote, off plan in 2013. Ms. Lerner, what does off plan mean . On the advice of my counsel i respectfully exercise my fifth amendment right and decline to answer that question. Ms. Lerner, in february of 2014, president obama stated that there was not a smidgen of corrupt
Anything. You can believe whatever you choose to believe t. I believe in fact based, empirical oversight. Innuendo and drawing conclusions and paranoia do not substitute for factbased, empirical oversight. Security fax here are the facts. An application. Subsequently was visited by osha, the fbi, atf, and was audited by the irs. You should be on the panel, given your views. Our issue spotlight Program Continues in a moment. You can watch more from the oversight hearing on our website. Irs targeting any search section. We invite your feedback on the issue spotlight program. On twitter, facebook, or by email. Our special look at the irs targeting Investigation Continues with lois lerner. Former director of the irs exempt organization took committeeat a meeting. It is about 20 minutes. The committee will come to order. We are here today to continue a hearing that began on may 22, 2013, called the i. R. S. Targeting americans for their political beliefs. The purpose of the hearing is to ga
Ms. Lerner, on saturday, our committees general counsel sent an email to your attorney saying, i understand that ms. Lerner is willing to testify and she is requesting a one week delay in talking to the chairman excuse me. In talking to the chairman, wanted to make sure that was right. Your lawyer in response to that question gave a oneword email response. Yes. Are you still seeking a oneweek delay in order to testify . On the advice of my counsel i respectfully exercise my fifth amendment right and decline to answer that question. Ladies and gentlemen, seeking the truth is the obligation of this committee. I can see no point in going further. I have no expectation that ms. Lerner will cooperate with this committee and therefore we shall mr. Chairman, i have a statement. I have a procedural question, mr. Chairman. Mr. Chairman, i have a procedural question. Mr. Chairman, you cannot run a Committee Like this. You just cannot do this. This is we are better than that as a country, were be