Please colloquy between he and the judge when he entered his change of plea. The council can make us aware of that behind. It is my understanding that there is a transcript, we dont have a copy of it right now. Counsel, you are not sworn, but if you could answer that gentlemans question as a member of the bar would be helpful for us to dispense with this. Mr. Chairman, there is no five 9 11 component to the plea agreement. The strait of plea agreement that does not require any additional testimony or affirmation. Did he receive a reduction in is guideline points . He did. Was a super acceptance or that twopoint acceptance . It was three. Two plus one. That does not include answering questions and he is not in jeopardy at a Congressional Committee hearing . No. It only requires acceptance of responsibility as contemplated by the guidelines. I would love to have a copy of that plea agreement. I am sure other attorneys and not attorneys would like to see it as well. I am going to direct s
In the hearing on capitol hill today the Senate Commerce Committee Looked at some of the government functions that have stopped as a result of the ongoing Government Shutdown. Among the witnesses was one of the stars of the popular reality show deadliest catch who spoke on the issue of commercial fishing permits and how its an issue to fisheries in alaska. I was one of the government functions addressed at this hearing. Its about two and a half hours. [inaudible conversations] for Debbie Hersman [inaudible] its like coming back on making no jaguar and so they will be here and johnson may or may not come and if he doesnt come i bless him and if he does, i bless him because this is what happens when you are in washington and the new breed about snowfall in the upper midwest. 1 2 of all the cattle in his state were killed. And thats their business. That is their business. They are not in north dakota. They are in south dakota. They have got cattle and farming. 1 2 and so if he comes back
Public comment . Come on up. Good afternoon commissioners im victor della cruz im here on behalf of the Development Company to express some dearns about the sea wall lot three will he notions that you are about in engage in. Our client is very concerned that the port of San Francisco is continuing to negotiate with the giant not with andlinging the departure of the quite iaye that constitutes the bulk of the propyling submitted by w w llc. , almost all of the development compatibility in the s w l associate the rl l c teams proposal seams to be out of the picture snow. The report is that the existing proposal is a little shell that reresembles nothing to the only proposals that is not only tremendously unfair to the other bidders who participants in this process but its not competitivive bidding. Cortiishs involvement not the giants the accordingly the commission does nottish an llc. , to be clear nobody doubts that the giant are a great Baseball Team but Everybody Knows that the giant
Them in terms of least obligation they have a Good Community partner. Number 210 inapt is committed to making a significant invest in the leasehold which will benefit of the port. Well we have seen that happen before and they are doing the same a 350,000 investment we consider that significant. They are taking an under utilized piece of the if you look at it, its an octogon so we have h i ask so eight sides and this they are taking the least used sign and put it in a new dinings and Beverage Service and so we think that is significant and there will be for that, then there is going to be generating roughly 350,000 of additional revenue to the port. So 350,000 investment and 350,000 potential return and no rent credit or rent abatement is being offend. So, number three, the benefits of the direct negotiations out weight the Competitive Bidding well we think there are significant Public Benefit to this so we are improving our visit Visitor Experience, we also have they are going to commi
Item two Public Comment and executive session, is there any Public Comment . Come on up. Good afternoon commissioners im victor della cruz im here on behalf of the Development Company to express some dearns about the sea wall lot three will he notions that you are about in engage in. Our client is very concerned that the port of San Francisco is continuing to negotiate with the giant not with andlinging the departure of the quite iaye that constitutes the bulk of the propyling submitted by w w llc. , almost all of the development compatibility in the s w l associate the rl l c teams proposal seams to be out of the picture snow. The report is that the existing proposal is a little shell that reresembles nothing to the only proposals that is not only tremendously unfair to the other bidders who participants in this process but its not competitivive bidding. Cortiishs involvement not the giants the accordingly the commission does nottish an llc. , to be clear nobody doubts that the giant