And before i introduce the men of the hours give jackson and to the organizers and spencers want our sponsors such as goo jackson naomi klein. We need bold radical ideas right now and then to do that in three ways. And by joining haymarket books and three no matter how small and post that in the chat as well. Does a be recorded please subscribe to the channel i like this video and share with as many people as possible and follow haymarket on the social media channel. Haymarket has events lined up and is not just a slogan in the age of coronavirus and other haymarket events in the youtube channel. And with that forbearance and then to reduce the mah quality. And then to navigate back to the book page in case of interruption. And we will have time for q a please dont answer any questions so please post your questions on the live video feed so just comment on the stream and on the video and we have the haymarket books and we tweeting at right now know its my pleasure i call him the coal t
For continuance item one filbert discretionary review is proposed for continuance until september 2016 item 2 Inclusionary Housing Program planning code is proposed until december 15, 2016, item 3 for case 18th street conditional use authorization is proposed july december 16th and further under our regular calendar item 14 for 854 cap street the address shown incorrectly on the agenda therefore needs to be continued the proposed date is september 29th thats. Case 2017 cu a i have no other items proposed for continuance i had one speaking for item one opening up for Public Comment on items on the continuance calendar richard. 62 filbert street the other applicant is stephanie and paul were requesting that the commission reschedule the hearing on the agenda from september 29th to a new date that works for us as well as the sponsor id like to briefly provide the context for this review the matter was originally scheduled for hearing on january 21st the 21st hearing was taken off the cale
Preliminary in relationgo negative declaration and next at the townsend street conditional use authorization is proposed. Continuance until november 10, 2016, and item 4 for case underscore two for chair wienerier the discretionary review authorization have been withdrawn the Zoning Administrator will consider the variance it remains on the agenda during our recess and infuriating under the consent calendar item 5 for case you 2016 at van ness avenue conditional use authorization weve received a request from members of the public and now from the pertaining to continue to september 29, 2016, and under the discretionary review authorization calendar im pleased to announce that item number 21 at he vermont street discretionary review that has been withdrawn i have no other items proposed for continuance and i have no speaker cards. Any Public Comment on the items proposed for continuance okay not seeing any, Public Comment is closed. Commissioner moore. I ask that item 20 and b be turned
Planning Commission Regular hearing for thursday, september 8, 2016, welcome back commissioners, i trust you enjoyed your recessed id like to remind the members of the audience that the commission does not tolerate disruptions of any kind. Please silence any devices that may sound off during the proceedings. And when speaking before the commission, if you care to, do state your name for the record. Id like to call roll at this time. Commissioner president fong commissioner Vice President richards commissioner hillis commissioner johnson and commissioner moore commissioners first is consideration for items proposed for continuance item one1 cashmere street conditional use authorization and is proposed until september and case no. Two at the Market Street an appeal of a preliminary in relationgo negative declaration and next at the townsend street conditional use authorization is proposed. Continuance until november 10, 2016, and item 4 for case underscore two for chair wienerier the dis
Time of the application. To get a hearing. So typically. But not typically im saying in totals for the 3 locations. Im trying to understand your argument as to why you think the 60 day requirement was violated im trying to understand after at t did the box walk is informs the department of public works weve done the box walk and given all the notice youve asked us to they see set a hearing and whats happening is the department is waiting several months to set a hearing. Its required under California Law to act between 60 days i understand what happened in the seven months what happened exactly. For whatever reasons the department is not promoting scheduling hearings. So nothing was unhappy youre saying it was just sitting there. I dont want to suggest the department has resources they work with us everyday. Okay. I just want our impression as i dont understand why they may have a liability reason thats not at ts doing according to dpw belief the average length from the box walk is one