Please make sure to silence all cell phone and electronic devices. Copies of any documents to be included the committee should be submitted to the clerk. Items will appear on the september 17th board of supervisors agenda, unless otherwise stated. Thank you. Please read item number one. Appointing supervisor Rafael Mandelman for a twoyear term to be to the bay area executive government regional committee. Great. Im going to make a motion to continue this item one week to september 16th rules committee meeting, per the request the from supervisor mandelman. Before i take a vote on the motion, i want to open up this item for Public Comment. Is there any member of the public who would like to speak . Please come right on up. I recommend he be appointed. By the same response, i want to guarantee that redevelopment rules pertain to 15 of all Apartment Building complexes, that comes out of the Mayors Office on housing. Its suppose to be to very low and lowincome bracket people. Youve been vi
Okay. He is checking his calendar. I will move to continue the item to september 18th to allow d. B. I. And planning to do inspections and determine what work might require for the permitting, or advise permitting we have a motion from Vice President lazarus to continue this appeal to september 18th, 2019, to give time for d. B. I. And planning, as necessary, to inspect the property and to determine what further work or permitting is necessary. On that motion. [roll call] that motion carries 40. We will see you september 18th i would encourage you to work with the Planning Department on plants. And we have no further business tonight so we are adjourned. This concludes the hearing. Thank you. Its great to see everyone kind of get together and prove, that you know, building our culture is something that can be reckoned with. I am desi, chair of Economic Development for soma filipinos. So that [ inaudible ] know that soma filipino exists, and its also our economic platform, so we can sta
The department has not been in touch with us and when he was asked about switching the side, he said it would offend his personal sensitivities. Thank you. Anymore members of the public who wish to comment on this item seeing none, Public Comment is closed. Commissioners . Definitely an appeal case. The orientation drives a lot of the comments that they brought forward. There is no doubt that the new building is taking the west of the existing appellant building. There is going to be a lot of shadow there. The question is how much. However, i was not quite satisfied with the permit holders approached in this. They could have easily given up some the height and the upper living floor between dining and the living room could easily have dropped some. Similarly, the setback could have been handled a little bit better. Maybe not as much is what the adjacent neighbors want to, but i would have expected this be in San Francisco because they would have been some movement there. We didnt see a
About is in fact on the ground floor. This is it here. It has a fullsized bath and walk in closet, fullsize appliances in the kitchen and its own private courtyard entry and gate as he mentioned. I can answer Additional Details about that in comments, but thats in the project now. The main house is in the second and third floor, the a. D. U. Is on the ground. The biggest thing theres been a lot of misinformation flying around about the shadow study. But suffice it to say in the summer months, you can see the existing on top and the proposed at the bottom. In the summer months, essentially, theres no change because the sun is so high in the sky. In the winter months, the opposite is true. The sun is so low that no sun penetration gets to the wall on 15 vasquez. Its important to note that the north, the east, and the south walls are not affected by our projects. What i studied the last three months are the period of time between the answer and the winter, that would be the he can whi can
Anymore members of the public who wish to comment on this item seeing none, Public Comment is closed. Commissioners . Definitely an appeal case. The orientation drives a lot of the comments that they brought forward. There is no doubt that the new building is taking the west of the existing appellant building. There is going to be a lot of shadow there. The question is how much. However, i was not quite satisfied with the permit holders approached in this. They could have easily given up some the height and the upper living floor between dining and the living room could easily have dropped some. Similarly, the setback could have been handled a little bit better. Maybe not as much is what the adjacent neighbors want to, but i would have expected this be in San Francisco because they would have been some movement there. We didnt see any. Commissioner richards . I have a few issues with this i think commissioner moore said sometimes it is 20 pounds and a 10pound bag. I have been looking a