Obligation they have a Good Community partner. Number 210 inapt is committed to making a significant invest in the leasehold which will benefit of the port. Well we have seen that happen before and they are doing the same a 350,000 investment we consider that significant. They are taking an under utilized piece of the if you look at it, its an octogon so we have h i ask so eight sides and this they are taking the least used sign and put it in a new dinings and Beverage Service and so we think that is significant and there will be for that, then there is going to be generating roughly 350,000 of additional revenue to the port. So 350,000 investment and 350,000 potential return and no rent credit or rent abatement is being offend. So, number three, the benefits of the direct negotiations out weight the Competitive Bidding well we think there are significant Public Benefit to this so we are improving our visit Visitor Experience, we also have they are going to commit to keeping the public
Youve all been here but my observation is the whole public roll is disappearing before my eyes. The reports on a project are for the public such as the commission. In fact, on love of the promises theyre more for the public then for the commission. Drs have a long public process baugs because of prop m but the rest of them dont have that process and the availability of documents so the public can comment on is really important. And every time your commissioners say we have enough to read every thursday youre not really getting the point. If the public doesnt have planned and the staff report from the developer so they can comment on it to you it doesnt become part of the record. Youre making it does of the aisle extremely difficult. Theres a different procure for drs. Your kci terminal out future comments permanently because every time you adapt an area plan you adapt exemptions but comments. And every development has a slew of exemptions why are what the developer submits to you what
One of the concept point for human power boating and this is urban beach around the northeastern shore line and access to the water from slip way four as well. With that in mind one. Things that we have had to present as part of the workshop is that we dont have the budget to complete the entire project as its designed today we had to look at the available fundings and the cost for the project today with the 2008 bonds and additional port funds our budge is 21 million for cran copark today. The estimates cost looking at Construction Cost and is plus an estimatemation contingency of 50 puts us at a subtotal of 33 million and are soft costs are between 30 and 33 and we have it at 33 and for a total cost of 43 andahalf Million Dollar and this equates to 4. 8 million in a customer, a acre which, is similar to other city front parks in the city and the other thing to note is because of the other high level conceptual of the park we have a 50 contingency because of the scion and that conting
Nonprofit use from the beginning and you know what the local methodists are also stopped by its all over with it was sold to making determine i didnt almost 10 years ago. People have been fidgeting in court preventing the sale any additional Public Comment . Sue hester. The Planning Commission is supposed to be the representative of the public. And looking at up here i dont know how how much experience any of the 7 of you have being a member of the public dealing with a project from the prospective of the public that comes to the Planning Commission. Maybe ive missed hearings and youve all been here but my observation is the whole public roll is disappearing before my eyes. The reports on a project are for the public such as the commission. In fact, on love of the promises theyre more for the public then for the commission. Drs have a long public process baugs because of prop m but the rest of them dont have that process and the availability of documents so the public can comment on is
Undoubtedly this will be going to court. Then we have, you know, 1601 larkin and steve is writing on that not on the sequa decision but on the illegal activities of decision based on private agreements between the neighborhood groups. Look in the paper may lee was there and 29 hundred people applied. With the no project alternative was called for by sequa and the method of wanting to build nonprofit use from the beginning and you know what the local methodists are also stopped by its all over with it was sold to making determine i didnt almost 10 years ago. People have been fidgeting in court preventing the sale any additional Public Comment . Sue hester. The Planning Commission is supposed to be the representative of the public. And looking at up here i dont know how how much experience any of the 7 of you have being a member of the public dealing with a project from the prospective of the public that comes to the Planning Commission. Maybe ive missed hearings and youve all been here