Any additional Public Comment . Sue hester. The Planning Commission is supposed to be the representative of the public. And looking at up here i dont know how how much experience any of the 7 of you have being a member of the public dealing with a project from the prospective of the public that comes to the Planning Commission. Maybe ive missed hearings and youve all been here but my observation is the whole public roll is disappearing before my eyes. The reports on a project are for the public such as the commission. In fact, on love of the promises theyre more for the public then for the commission. Drs have a long public process baugs because of prop m but the rest of them dont have that process and the availability of documents so the public can comment on is really important. And every time your commissioners say we have enough to read every thursday youre not really getting the point. If the public doesnt have planned and the staff report from the developer so they can comment on
Restaurants. It generating a lot of noise. Its a jewish bar they play loud music and its inconvenient. When i look at those planning projects in motion its look on the back payment it says this restaurants right here in the existing restaurants so, you know, food and it was never a restaurant. And also about the comments over here it says the number of Public Comments received it says zero. Ive made many comments ive k34u79d by mail with the building inspectors it says zero. Another thing if they zoo dont have all the permits to open this business. The question i have now by the way, i didnt have a chance to make my comment earlier are my comments going to be considered. Thats my question. Because they said it was closed i submitted a card but it turns out sir unfortunately, this department of Motor Vehicles isnt a comment and question period. I will respond because i have not had a chance to respond. They have made their decision on the matter it was under scent owe the president of t
Youve all been here but my observation is the whole public roll is disappearing before my eyes. The reports on a project are for the public such as the commission. In fact, on love of the promises theyre more for the public then for the commission. Drs have a long public process baugs because of prop m but the rest of them dont have that process and the availability of documents so the public can comment on is really important. And every time your commissioners say we have enough to read every thursday youre not really getting the point. If the public doesnt have planned and the staff report from the developer so they can comment on it to you it doesnt become part of the record. Youre making it does of the aisle extremely difficult. Theres a different procure for drs. Your kci terminal out future comments permanently because every time you adapt an area plan you adapt exemptions but comments. And every development has a slew of exemptions why are what the developer submits to you what
Nonprofit use from the beginning and you know what the local methodists are also stopped by its all over with it was sold to making determine i didnt almost 10 years ago. People have been fidgeting in court preventing the sale any additional Public Comment . Sue hester. The Planning Commission is supposed to be the representative of the public. And looking at up here i dont know how how much experience any of the 7 of you have being a member of the public dealing with a project from the prospective of the public that comes to the Planning Commission. Maybe ive missed hearings and youve all been here but my observation is the whole public roll is disappearing before my eyes. The reports on a project are for the public such as the commission. In fact, on love of the promises theyre more for the public then for the commission. Drs have a long public process baugs because of prop m but the rest of them dont have that process and the availability of documents so the public can comment on is
Undoubtedly this will be going to court. Then we have, you know, 1601 larkin and steve is writing on that not on the sequa decision but on the illegal activities of decision based on private agreements between the neighborhood groups. Look in the paper may lee was there and 29 hundred people applied. With the no project alternative was called for by sequa and the method of wanting to build nonprofit use from the beginning and you know what the local methodists are also stopped by its all over with it was sold to making determine i didnt almost 10 years ago. People have been fidgeting in court preventing the sale any additional Public Comment . Sue hester. The Planning Commission is supposed to be the representative of the public. And looking at up here i dont know how how much experience any of the 7 of you have being a member of the public dealing with a project from the prospective of the public that comes to the Planning Commission. Maybe ive missed hearings and youve all been here