flow of a narrative. and it s not like it was a perfect science about thus. but when you line up notes together and you show that they re contemporaneous, that s arer a way they do it. for this ubstreobstruction case they re so consistent with what comey said. i want to go back to valentine s day where there was a conversation between trump and komy where he says to comey flynn is a good guy. flynn had just been fired. immediate lae. and on february 14th goes to comey and said flynn is a good guy. how about letting him go. that s a more direct intervention. that s more than saying can can you lift a cloud? i don t think iyou can base an obstruction case on lifting a cloud. but ifuts a it s part of a chai vents, that s trump getting into