flow of a narrative. and it's not like it was a perfect science about thus. but when you line up notes together and you show that they're contemporaneous, that's arer a way they do it. for this ubstreobstruction case they're so consistent with what comey said. i want to go back to valentine's day where there was a conversation between trump and komy where he says to comey flynn is a good guy. flynn had just been fired. >> immediate lae. >> and on february 14th goes to comey and said flynn is a good guy. how about letting him go. that's a more direct intervention. that's more than saying can can you lift a cloud? i don't think iyou can base an obstruction case on lifting a cloud. but ifuts a it's part of a chai vents, that's trump getting into