On the Judge Jeanine pirro, jessica tarlov, Jesse Watters, and she can do a triple axle on an ice cube. Dana perino. The five. A trio of crises threatening to upend the race about a month before election day. Ports shut down over a Dock Worker Strike that could cost billions of dollars a day. Threaten jobs and jack up inflation. A chaotic Hurricane Recovery that has survivors desperately pleading for basic necessities. And in The Middle East on the brink of war as israel mold a response to Irans Barrage of missiles. That also has one key question how can kamala be trusted to handle it all when she is still fumbling her way through interviews like this . Former President Trump says that you have had for years as Vice President to do all the things you promised in the campaign, but havent done it. Is he right . The former president is is really becoming quite desperate. And has really been offering a lot of misstatements and misinformation, and perhaps it is because he wants to distract
greg: donald trump holding a rally in wisconsin. i m greg gutfeld with judge jeanine pirro, harold ford jr., jesse watters, sandra smith. it s the five. right now donald trump firing up supporters and a key swing state. the former president hammering joe biden s failures in wisconsin. week, fails, incompetent joe biden. he s an incompetent person. quite simply we are going to make america great again. under crooked joe biden, the world is in flames. our border is overrun. inflation is raging. europe is in total chaos. the middle east is exploding. iran is in bolton, china is on the march on the worst most incompetent most corrupt president in history is going to drag us into world war iii. first he wandered off the g7 in europe, he looked like he did know where the hell he was but he didn t. is anybody going to watch the debate? he s going to be so pumped up. he s going to be pumped up. greg: joe biden spending $50 million to call trump a convicted felon with ads like
They needed to remove bone and go into the area around the brain. Ill just show you. It takes you into this area in the front of the brain here on the left side, again, as you know. So, whether it was on top of the brain or in the brain, whatever this abnormality was, theyre calling it a blood clot, we dont know. It did involve going into the brain. Five centimeters is about two inches. From here to here. Pretty sizeable, what were talking about. We dont know what this is. The pathologists have to look at this under a microscope and determine for sure what it is. It could be a blood clot, which would probably be the best news of all but pathologists want to be sure its not Something Else as well. What are the important things that would lead neurosurgeons like yourself to look for Something Like this . You wont typically scan for Something Like this. Ive read a lot about the fact that he has had this history of melanoma that can cause bleeding in the area. Is that why they would have b
you re saying basically that this still leaves the door open to possible collusion? i ve spoken to white house officials who say, look, these indictments say that no one from the trump campaign wittingly worked with any of these russians, rod rosenstein came out today. doesn t this show that there was no collusion? it sounds like you have a different take. i have a very different take and i m sure that the white house counsel and the special counsel, ty cobb, are looking at this statute and saying, who else might this reach? while they ll obviously take the position that nobody wittingly was involved, there s some witnesses with people like michael flynn and george papadopoulos who might be able to finger people. we don t know who all they might have looked at, at this point. this is definitely an indictment to build on. you re right. we don t know what we don t
anti-u.s. campaign in 2014, long before i announced that i would run for president. the results of the election were not impacted. the trump campaign did nothing wrong. no collusion. david chalian, no surprise, i guess, with that response. certainly no surprise. this panel predicted almost each sentence in that tweet. to the point about this the indictment going back to 2014, the president should make that a point. i think it underline s sara s point that she s been making earlier, it s been such for quite some period of time that it would be good to hear from the president about everything he s doing to prevent that from ever happening again and to take that so seriously. you see why we don t get that in the second half of the tweet. he wants to make sure it s not clouded with him doing anything wrong, or his campaign. i would say while rod rosenstein