be seen whether chris mays will get that kind of cooperation from republicans who are privy to those conversations. yeah, that such an important distinction, actually, the way that georgia republicans handlers versus the arizona republicans. it tells you something about the republican party in states by states across the country. what about nevada? because nevada is mentioned in the jacks mitt federal indictment. and yet the nevada a.g. has not brought any charges here, and is also a democrat. right. the nevada a.g. has actually said publicly he doesn t intend, too because he doesn t believe the statutes in his state would allow him to bring a case. he actually stood up and supported nevada state legislators, wanted to make being a fake elector itself a crime in nevada. but where it came to sort of more nebulous statutes that could apply to lots of different situations, like forgery or solicitation, he, unlike fani willis, i thought that wasn t enough. so, he announced a he wou
for word, a tweet sent by then georgia state senator birthed jones, also on december 7th. so, unnamed and unindicted, but for how long? still with me, joyce vance and laura jarrett. laura, we are going to know the names of these 30 unindicted coconspirators, one would presume, relatively soon. it feels like, just from the general sleuthing we have done, that a fair number of them are fake electors who have immunity deals squared away. the rest of them i mean, are these potential average points for the government? is that why they are unnamed and unindicted as? yet so, it depends. sometimes you see this jury situation like this because they are still working out a little bit of a deal. so, perhaps the person is going to provide some testimony in exchange for. that it will get immunity. sometimes the government just doesn t have the evidence to make the case for whatever reason. maybe they don t have the text or the calls. or sometimes it s just messy, right? and so you listed as an
arranging phone calls, made visiting official of his affair facilities, down at the state, in cobb county prosecutors take issue with that. but i wonder, when we talk about flipping and sometimes when you have such a large pool of codefendants, the goal of the prosecutor is to leverage all of these people against each other. do you see this giant number of codefendants as a potential pool for flipping just to be i don t know. of course! can we call it flippage? i m not sure. walt nauta i don t know that kanye west s former publicists wants to face 5 to 20 years in prison. i m not saying she is going to get five to do you want to gamble? that she is part of the someone you don t have a relationship with. this is a serious charge. i just think the incentives in this case are very different.
high-profile cases against individual defendants play out in court over the past few years. the trial against trump s former campaign manager paul manafort, for example. we know how those trials work. but what about a case against 19 people? but what about a rico case? how will this all work? and now that all 19 of this these individuals are facing serious jail time, how soon until someone in this case flips? make no mistake, as much as trump is surrounded by coconspirators case here, in both a federal case in the georgia case, even someone like rudy giuliani is ultimately just day capo in this criminal enterprise. the big boss the endgame here is donald j trump. and the question tonight is, does the rico law that rudy giuliani built his career on does that ultimately ensnare donald j trump? joining me now is joyce vance, former district attorney for the northern district of alabama, and laura jarrett,