this is the major leagues. people thought the view looked good from the cheap seats and now they see it is real. look at huckabee. because he did this before doing this once before is the greatest experience you can ever have. what are the other thins i thought was interesting, all of a sudden, everybody has got a doctrine. the rubio doctrine he s named himself. now the paul doctrine. don t you have to have policies and then have those policies play out and then rename the doctrine. only a couple of months ago we got president obama s doctrine of don t do stupid stuff. the word sounds good and we live in a world where people don t follow this stuff all that closely until we get within a month of election day and everything has to fit into a 15-second sound bite. if it sounds good you have something. does hillary own the clinton
doctrine? well, no i think her husband has first clinton doctrine. she can drive off of that? if jeb is a nominee, he was a president prior to we ll talk about soaring deficits once president bush took over and now we ll continue that debate. important policy where the obama approval rating is 39% and even though she was secretary of state, it is a drag on her the question is whether or not the republicans can use that opening to get further. and we ll see what happens. the debates will continue long long times from now. shannon has more. just ahead, a symbol of support, how pope francis is offering hope to christians being persecuted in the middle east.
president s alleys are saying allies are saying that post-9/11 over and going back to the standards of going after terrorists before 9/11. is that what he said? return to the clinton doctrine without the muscle and emphasis. paul: is that what he doing? he is basically saying we can t have an endless war. it goes against our values. paul: isn t that true? look, war isn t declared doesn t end when we say it is over. we face a continued and one my argue a growing threat from al-qaeda in various places we didn t know existed. before 9/11, terrorists are going to hit at navy ship or bomb an embassy in africa and then we discovered a number of these incidents continue and one of these days towers are going down in a big city. paul: but isn t it true the threat has evolved.
media are saying he has essentially declared the post-9/11 era over and we re going back to the standards of going after terrorists before 9/11. right. right? is that what he said? return to the clinton doctrine without the muscle and emphasis. do you think that that s what he s doing some. that s exactly what he s doing. he s basically saying we can t have an endless war, it goes against our values, our tradition. isn t that true? well, look, war isn t declared when we say it it doesn t end when we say it s over. he even points out we face a continued and one might argue a growing threat from al qaeda in various places we didn t realize existed. before 9/11 maybe they would hit a navy ship or bomb a distant embassy in africa and then we woke up one morning and discovered you let a number of these incidents continue and one of these days towers will go down in a big city. isn t it true the threat has
she has traveled all over the place. set some record, some 112 countries. the list of achievements that can be attributed to her is not long and is not major. i mean, how well is the reset with russia worked out which she was very much involved in starting? how are things between arabs and israelis? closer to peace than before? how about iran? north carolina? their nuclear weapons programs. have they been retarded, held back, halted? no, i don t think so. so you look around for a clinton doctrine, has she articulated as kind of a foreign policy intellectual, a new way of thinking, a comprehensive doctrine for foreign policy or doctrine for any particular reason? i would say not. what about major treaties? has she engaged in negotiations that led to the signing of major treaties or any major treaty? the answer to all of those questions appears to be no. these are the kind of things that might put you in the category of a great secretary of state. i m not saying she hasn t tried hard. sh