having. they have allowed states to protect unborn life. they ve protected our second amendment rights. our free speech rights. they end with the climate decision, have restore the separation of powers and taken a blow against the administrative state. these are major conservative victories, and every conservative in america should have forwards on their lips right now. thank you, donald trump you every republican president going back to the 1970s, half or more of their nominees have either defected to the liberals or become a swing votes that vote with them on key issues. liberal justices never vote with the right, so donald trump is the first president who has appointed three judicial conservatives who rule as judicial conservatives as they promised to you on the court, and not have had massive impact already. this is just the first term of this new majority. it s going to get better and better. julie: i think people actually need to go back to third through sixth grade here.
undoing 50 years of protection of roe v. wade, the decision on the conceal carry case out of new york, rolling back gun safety at the worst possible time in the wake of the uvalde tragedy, among others. and now this ruling that undermines the federal government s ability to tackle the climate crisis, which is real, existential. here today, clear and present danger. not something theoretic 15, 20 years from now. the supreme court has hurt itself in terms of people having confidence in it because of the justification of many of the rulings. look at the roe v. wade decision. the way they went about that calls into question rights and protections we ve enjoyed for years. so, supreme court reform, i think, is very much on the table. and i will also mention this, jose, because there say bright spot peer. hoed is the day we will see the swearing in of justice ketanji
more than 60,000 people that have been living in there. for them, remain in mexico has been remain in misery, remain in threat of death, remain in threat of exploitation. what are the folks telling you, gabe? yeah, jose, you ve seen it firsthand yourself. but in the last few minutes i ve spoken with two ngos down at the border. one of them in reynoso, mexico, the sidewalk school. this is an organization, jose, that has sprung up to try and help some of those migrant children. and i just got off the phone with her just seconds ago, the leader of this organization, and she told me, that is wonderful. just a sigh of relief. something she had been waiting for for quite a long time. as you mentioned, jose, the remain in mexico policy, this policy that has kept thousands of tens of thousands of migrants in border towns on the mexico side while they await their asylum proceedings, this organization the sidewalk school says that the situation has been deteriorating.
campaign. this idea that biden framed the 2020 choice as a battle for the soul of the nation is exactly what the white house is thinking through as they re considering this potential speech as well. it s also, jose, in the context of how the white house is planning for the months ahead, using the midterm election campaign to set up a potential biden 2024 campaign. this is a president who is somewhat frustrated by the conversation in the party about whether or even if he should run for re-election, whether he should, and they re planning to use the fall midterm campaign as a chance for the president to show he has the stamina, even as the oldest president in american history to run for a second term, and also still has a message for the party, for the country, that could win. especially his view that he s the only democrat who could beat donald trump this in a potential rematch in 2024. meanwhile, what is the committee hoping to learn from cipollone? reporter: yeah, we ve heard the
between the obama and trump administrations. the obama administration had proposed a much broader clean air program for the epa that would encourage industries to switch to clean energy. the trump administration trimmed that back. the question is how broad is the epa s authority? the answer from the supreme court today is not broad at all. the court has gone on to say that this is what is called a major question. this has been a darling of conservatives. the idea that federal agencies when they rule on when they set regulations that would change policy in a broad way, that that that s a major question and that they can t do that unless they have authority from congress to act. so, this decision is not only something that will restrict the epa s authority going forward but also may have implications for other federal agencies who want to undergo regulatory