Along hunting park avenue. That underpass there is flooded out. Take a look at some of the video we shot as this break was still acti active earlier tonight. You can see the power of the water eating away at the parking lot. This is a 48inch transmission line thats been in place since the late 1800s. This 8 00 break meant some inconvenience for neighbors in this area. Take a listen. There were some low pressure issues. We didnt turn anyones water off but when you have a main of this size break, sometimes pressure goes down in some homes. About quarter of 10 00, everyone should have had full pressure back restored and normal service. Reporter nbc 10 covered major water main break literally around the corner from here back in june. The Water Department has told me that the june water main break was not the same main as tonights but it was part of the same grouping of four large transmission lines that runs under that area. That twohour spill back in june spilled some seven million gallon
I guess its just odd to me that state legislatures dont get a little bit of the benefit of the doubt in terms of when the pacing is right for them. Ms. Stanyar again, in michigan it doesnt matter what the legislators do anymore. Its a constitutional ban. Judge sutton four of the states did this through initiatives. In other words, four of the states ruled that it came out the right way in your clients perspective through initiatives. Initiatives are just as effective as legislation on this point. Ms. Stanyar ourselves would have to be repealed. We talked about that already. In addition, judge freedman found that the constitution is for the here and now. This court doesnt have the luxury of dodging a constitutional dodging a constitutional challenge. I understand that the court in perry didnt decide the ultimate question. The court looks to be telegraphing in windsor in terms of some doctrinal change, and if the court was intending on telegraphing, it worked. But 20 straight decisions w
The mother and the father. Remember, in the trial below the experts on the plaintiffs side conceded there are differences between mothering and fathering, there are different benefits for each one. Judge daughtrey what is the rational basis for excluding everybody else . I mean, it doesnt cut down on the procreation of children, interfere with the pro creation of children just because you got two people of the samesex marrying and in some of those marriages, one of them, one of the partners is able to procreate. Aaron linstrom first i have to point out that the rational basis with a different view, that is flipping the question. The robison case lays this out very clearly by the United States Supreme Court where it points out that the question for rational basis for view is whether the state interest that is being put forward, if its being vabsed by including a first group and by including a second group that does not advance that interest is not irrational, it does not extend benefits
Current clergy will be required to solemnize the marriage. Religious conflict is not a basis for denying fundamental rights. If and when the case was presented the court would have to balance competing Constitutional Rights the way it always has. The court is required to do this. You look at the hierarchy of rights and the level of intrusion. The court would render a decision. We have alleged that intermediate scrutiny applies here because plaintiffs as gay and lesbian persons qualify because of class status. We renew that argument here and differ to the brief and the wonderful brief of the lot institution professors. Just briefly we believe the Equality Foundation could be revisited. It does not require a decision because there is an inconsistent decision, Equality Foundation was inconsistent with the Supreme Court that requires modification. The decision, it could be the court a class the applies the cleburne factors. Davis scarborough did not have to address the standard of scrutiny
City alone. All our nonprofit providers, [speaker not understood]. They do a fantastic job, they do a good job providing quality housing, housing, and keeping folks housed. We wanted to get as many people as shelter as possible. People didnt need to get housing ready. They needed to [speaker not understood]. The vast majority for chronically homeless single adults. We have a number of 43 1 units in the pipeline that should come online over the next two years or two plus years. Once theyre online, well hit our goal over 3,000, 386 units according to the plan. And again, i talk about targeting, the vast majority of units are dedicate today chronically single homeless single adults [speaker not understood]. Can i ask you a question on that . In reading around the documents, funding is a big deal for us as a city for every issue, let alone this. Several dollars seem to be targeted on what the definition of homelessness is and limited in a way because of that. So, our foil us on the chronic