Hours straight the system is not large enough to handle those storms youve seen those pictures in the news that one is the lake we had a we knew is was marked for clean up up it collapsed the street and im sure youre aware of in San Francisco the streets are concrete enforced and the quart main the services are back in service and were actually for the repair of this particular one . The largest sink hole during this time and, yes weve been down this street, however, for stormwater historically weve not had trouble the lines are clear and everything is fine you, however, we didnt get this cail so we couldnt track it they called 911 instead of 311 so cleaver the leaves and drains it effected all the homes you see the xs weve helping them out with clean up and every place contractors and employees to help folks this is what it looks like on this street this is all the folks getting theyre stiff out again our contractors out there trying to help them out the best we can we have another on
Until we have that Comfort Level up. When you say polling are you talking about an actual poll to survey by phone . Yes. The phone survey of customers. Its refreshing of the same survey, same type of survey we connected earlier on in the program to make sure we still have good data to base our expectations of customer opt out and acceptance of the program offering. Is that something you can share next time we meet . Yeah, we should be in a position to share the questions. I think were going to preview the approach with you informally. I dont know if that preview can happen in the public setting given i dont think we want to wait for that until we launch it. I think it would be great to share with you as members of lafco. Yeah, sounds great. [inaudible] i can wait. Thank you. So we did have as i said our Commission Meeting on tuesday did address the cleanpower sf. We did get a presentation from local power, our consultants that are advisingous how to structure the program to accelerate
Commissioner schmeltzer. Absent. Commissioner mar. Commissioner pimentel. If i may i know with commissioner pimentel there is an illness and if we could excuse here. Okay. Mr. Chair, we have a quorum. Before we start we would like to thank the clerk linda wong and acknowledge the sfgtv staff for covering the meeting today. Madam clerk if you can please call item two. Item two is election of the chairperson and the vicechairperson for 2013. Okay colleagues this is something that we do every year at the local Agency Formation commission, and ive had the honor of serving in the capacity of chair of lafco for the last two years following the tenure of then commissioner that was before me and it has been an exciting time for me, a fruitful two years, and the most important thing of course that happened in the last two years is the fact that we got approval of the Community Choice Aggregation Program by the board of supervisors, and i want to thank the interim executive officer as well as la
Communications . Item number four, Public Comment . What i want to say is that as we live in the sewer system Improvement Project and as we look at especially back on the inaudible we need to have a plan for the community and a good out reach for the community. Some of it have already started it on our own and we need to, the assistance, of the sfpuc, to really have the community, because, again, and again, as we notice with the water system, Improvement Projects, and everything was left for the 11th hour. And with the Community Benefits of the water system Improvement Project, if you evaluate that, it was done and again and again and again, that is on the commission but we need to address the sewer system Improvement Project in a very wholistic manner because as you commissioners know especially those who have been there for quite a long time, the community was impacted. And so i feel like what is happening, and you know, you can do what whatever you all want to. But, you have to know
Towards the reduction from 11. 9, 011. 5. Would you like two minutes . Yes, two minutes, yes. Commissioners . Today, we had a lengthy presentation and discussion on this matter. And the purpose of this amendment is to tell pg e that sfpuc can bring this number to the same number that pg e proposes. Which is nine. So, that is the only purpose. That sfpuc is on the equal footing or has the resources or can deliver a product the same as pg e. And in my humble opinion, we cannot. This is a moving target. We cannot. There are 105 years of experience and we have none. That is the only purpose. And that presentation of the many, many, many, loop holes, so with this rate, we are also need to know, what is the quality, what is the unit quality of the entity . We need the critical data. Not just reduce the amount, we want to know. The public needs to know. So, inaudible lies, can be thrown out there to inaudible , we want to know that if you give Something Back to the unit, that particular unit,