own attorney general was in place, not only what we are seeing now unfold but also with people arriving and nobody knowing what to do once people have actually landed and they had visas. someone had to think this through. from my standpoint, a legal standpoint, you re fnot going t do something as dramatic as this that you have not run by the senior level unless you are intentionally bypassing them. are you saying he might have expected or wanted this level of disruption? from a political standpoint, yes. legally no one could have ass e assumed that sally yates or anyone would have decided to defend this order given their reservations about this. thank you. always a pleasure to talk with you. the protests have gone
which is not going to generate money from the state. it s taking capital costs and putting them in an operating budget. don t have to raise the gas tax. that s the problem politically. at the heart of this particular issue, there s something called the martin act. yes. new york state statute. can you explain in terms this is my understanding of this is that people on wall street, new york side here fear this thing, it s a new york state law and because this is the manhattan district attorney looking into it, this is a law with real teeth in it. important point. you remember paul fishman is investigating sandy-gate. this is a whole different prosecutor with a whole different team of agents and investigators looking into this pulaski bridge scandal, they have the martin act, class e felony and says if you misrepresent any material fact
uma: eric, they want to send a strong message. they should send a strong message. uma: airing rick, go ahead. a pint of sweat will save a gallon of blood. that is the point the government wants to do. i agree with everything fred is saying. you don t buy cigarettes for mine morse. minors. however the government will have a difficult situation trying to get conviction in this case. normally the fed indict you by information they have done their homework. in this case the allegations, these are allegations. the guns were purchased in 2010. there are no eyewitnesses. time is always a defendant s friend. there are eyewitnesses that weren t interviewed. how are they going to prove in a court of law she was there and that she knew that he was a felon and that she purchased these weapons for him? and that is the problem the prosecution will have with this case. they shouldn t, you should not purchase weapons for a felon but they re going to have a difficult time trying to prove and tryi
they should? reporter: we asked homeland security for a sponges, but there was nothing response, but there was nothing for us on the record. i got a drone that was $299 that will fly over my neighborhood and it will spy on everyone, but i down the. what about these drones. reporter: we found this photo submitted by the texas department of public safety in 2011. for a license to operate the wasp, a laptop computer monitors mission progress. fothis drone is guided by a joystick. the city of harrington kansas has a license to operate this snow goose unmanned aircraft system in class e and class g air space. critics say these drones are vehicles for other types of technology. they call it the payload. you can swap out the payload, whether it s a surveillance tool like a different type of camera, a video camera, a thermal imaging camera or maybe it has a weapon. we re not seeing that in the uts
school district so he s going to have an automatic 180 day suspension, is that correct? that s a possibility. we have to determine is what was the intent. so yes, an expulsion from school. a reassignment to a district alternative education plan. that s all under investigation. but who should be held accountable? the parent is the one that the investigators are currently working with because it could lead to anything from a class e misdemeanor of allowing a child access to a firearm to certainly a much more serious charge of endangerment to a child. but that s in the hands of our houston police department. all right. sam sarabia, the chief of the elementary schools officer of houston independent school district. thanks for your thoughts this morning. thank you. talk about a major medical mix-up. doctors operate on the wrong eye on this child. now this boy s parents want to know how did the doctors get it wrong? and you know him as the old spice guy. hello, look at i ll loo