Federal Circuit affirmed Patent Trial & Appeal Board obviousness decision finding patent owner failed to explain extrinsic evidence supported proposed claim construction. Uniloc 2017 LLC v. Netflix, Inc. Uniloc owns a patent directed to a more efficient method for encoding videos.
In AMP Plus, Inc. v. DMF, Inc., No. 21-1595 (Fed. Cir. Nov. 10, 2022), the Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit affirmed the Patent Trial and Appeal Board's ("the Board") decision.
The US Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit concluded that a district court did not abuse its discretion in striking expert testimony where the testimony did not rely on an agreed and court-adopted claim construction.
In SolarEdge Techs., Inc. v. Fronius Int'l GMBH, No. IPR2022-00849 (P.T.A.B. Oct. 21, 2022), the Patent Trial and Appeal Board ("PTAB") denied institution of inter partes review challenging U.S.