In Treehouse Avatar LLC v. Valve Corporation, No. 2022-1171 (Fed. Cir. Nov. 30, 2022), the Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit ("the Federal Circuit") affirmed the decision from.
The Federal Circuit has affirmed a lower court’s striking of an expert’s report on patent infringement, on the basis that it was materially different from the claim construction agreed.
I. Introduction - In Treehouse Avatar LLC v. Valve Corp., the Federal Circuit affirmed the Western District of Washington’s decisions to (i) strike portions of an expert.
The US Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit concluded that a district court did not abuse its discretion in striking expert testimony where the testimony did not rely on an agreed and court-adopted claim construction.
The US Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit concluded that a district court did not abuse its discretion in striking expert testimony where the testimony did not rely on an agreed.