And for a number of years was the chair of lafco. What you have to understand is that the history of the lafco in San Francisco is a unique one and lafco in San Francisco has not played a role as other jurisdictions. I think that has been a mistake in the sense that there is a lot of potential for lafco playing the role of ensuring good government, best practices within city agencies. In fact thats what other lafcos do. They provide oversight and provide ideas on how to more efficiently effectively manage and provide government services. And it allows for agencies like the board of supervisors to use resources other than the general fund to conduct issues and reviews. The perfect example is what would with the issue of garbage and Waste Management where lafco was instrumental in helping with that. What this does is it simply allows us to be able to proceed with expanding the scope of that work. In that sense it brings the San Francisco lafco in line with every other lafco in the state
Line with every other lafco in the state of california. I also think that to the extent that there are specific concerns about how the individual position has been filled will be filled and how that will be managed. I can tell you as chair of lafco and i know the commissioner supervisor avalos does the same thing that there is a lot of time and care that goes into managing lafco staff. When i was chair of lafco as is the case with supervisor avalos, its very careful monitoring of staff, scheduling and all of that. I think that its really imperative to move this item forward. I dont know what the hesitation has been but i know that we are sort of tying lafcos hands by not moving forward and i ask that that happen expeditiously. Supervisor norman yee supervisor tang . Supervisor katy tang thank you supervisor campos. I do agree with the change of the scope of the position for the Senior Program officer and i believe the cost and savings is very justified. The question that i do have, aga
Madam clerk please call item no. 1. City clerk item 1 130401 health code Hazardous Materials]1304011. Ordinance amending the health code to require electronic applications for registration of Hazardous Materials and for underground storage tanks be filed through the California Environmental reporting system, to eliminate the requirement that registration of Hazardous Materials plans include a program for reduction of Hazardous Materials, and to provide for fee adjustment; and making environmental findings. City clerk sf 11234 supervisor norman yee i believe cindy from the department of Public Health is here to present. Good afternoon supervisors, my name is cindy, i manage planning and fiscal policy in the Environmental Health branch. Im here with paula, our senior staff at our Hazardous Material and waste program. Its part of the Environmental Health branch of the San Francisco department of Public Health. The program implements six state environmental mandates and two local mandates.
Fish company for this opportunity, they approved the selection of wood house fish company. A little bit about wood house, theyre a family owned business, those of you who sat on the Operations Committee were able to meet the family today, they have two locations in San Francisco, one on fill mer street and one on market street, theyre owned by jaim miswhos the father and his sons, dylan, roan and tyler. I wanted to walk you through the negotiated Lease Agreement with wood house. The term is for ten years with two five year options to extend, permitted use is for the operation of a restaurant at the site. The negotiated minimum annual guarantee is 110 thousand dollars and that would increase with cpi on an annual basis, the rent would be paid as the minimum annual or 10 which is 10 of gross revenues underand over10 Million Dollars, were requires a 20 thousand dollar Security Deposit and we are proposing to issue a rent credit in the amount of 160 thousand dollars to wood house and this
Next lafco meeting or soon as possible. Supervisor katy tang okay. Thank you. Supervisor norman yee so, i guess im the only standing person from this committee here. I recall this discussion last year when it came to this committee. I certainly was in favor of the changing the scope of responsibilities. And my colleagues at the time on this meeting had many variety of questions about it and so it was determined at this point to continue this item to where it is today. I also have some concerns in regards to and much of it is going to be the result of your discussion that they will have once they get the authority to have the discussion. But its more on whats really going to happen. What really is the work here. I think maybe one 1 year is a little short. By the time you have determined the work, its okay, lets go back. But at the same time, i think supervisor ankh tangs concern is warranted. I will see what kind of reaction i get from this. Is if we allow enough time for that discussio