Disinvited from Graduation Ceremony Office Student protest. This is an hour. Good afternoon, and welcome to the city club of cleveland. My name is paul harrison. Im pleased to introduce todays speaker, president and cofounder of the American Council of trustees and alumni. As stated on its website, acta is on Academic Freedom, the website states that the ideas of Academic Freedom and free speech are at the core of academic speech. And freedom in research is essential to the advancement of truth. Todays forum offers a wonderful opportunity to juxtapose freedom of speech and Academic Freedom and just a moment to reflect on our 102year history at the city club of cleveland. We proudly refer to the city club as in 1923, the city club invited famous labor leader, socialist and perennial president ial candidate eugene deps to speak and he accepted. Asking mr. Depps to speak, caused ultimately mr. Depps determined to decline the invitation and he wrote that he was feeling disinclined to intru
Your specific term. I just want to say this, that the word institutionalization, for these programs, is not one that weve started talking about as a community, say, in the last six months. Under the leadership of the agac, the attorney generals advisory committee, our first chairman was todd jones who had been a former u. S. Attorney in the late 1990s. He came back he said he is a recidivist came back as u. S. Attorney again starting in 2008. Todd preached from day one in institutionalization. Paul did as well, Loretta Lynch as well. Lanny wanted to respond though. I was just going to give an answer to the judges question, one example that my colleagues can talk about what theyre doing in their districts. But the attorney general was mindful of it, so one of the privileges when you are the head of the Criminal Division is you work with the u. S. Sentencing commission and we did do that. We also are able to work with the attorney general and with your colleagues in the u. S. Attorneys o
Explicitly say you shall not regulate or oversee the internet under title 2. Do you agree with that . As ive testified consistently, i think the cost and damage to americans ambitions of bradband in title 2 far outweigh the benefits. I think if the narrow task before us is to create solid bullet proof Net Neutrality, which we accept, we believe that can be done without resorting to that hammer. Mr. Chairman, i want to thank the former chairman for those comments. I do believe that its wise to put this out as a draft. I think there are some very valid questions and my friends on the minority are asking some of those questions about how to perfect the language. I have some concerns myself about certain parts of the draft. But the base principle, the fact we should not regulate the internet under title 2, i think is beyond question. If we start from that premise i think the discussion draft is an excellent document and we can iron out the details through these hearings. If you take it to
The necessary funds and as we highlighted in our report and also try to do it now. If the prices go to 80 and below we may see that the brazil may be one of the regions which will have the toughest challenges because the investments are basically financed through cash flows. And if they go down they need to go and increase their debts, which should be a major issue for petro bus. Of course there is a major question about Production Growth coming from brazil. Turning the page on sort of the issue of subsidies, an issue that i would give you all and the in general tremendous credit for actually framing a lot of the debate and quantifying a lot of how we talk about Energy Subsidies on both the fossilbased and Renewable Energy side of the equation. You mentioned there was progress being made on the subsidies issue. How can you can you characaterize a little bit the sort of nature of that progress . Because i think one of the ways you had sort of talked about it was sending a signal about s
And we will end with a note of humility and thank the panel. They have been [applause] [captions Copyright National cable satellite corp. 2014] [captioning performed by the national captioning institute, which is responsible for its caption content and accuracy. Visit ncicap. Org] clerks Gina Mccarthy framed the of eight to the groundlevel ozone standard as an imperative, bringing agency rules in line with the latest science with the agencys most burnable populations. Though law based on review of that science and based on the independent Science Advisors, experts the epa science , and my judgment as the epa administrator, i am proposing to strengthen the standards to within a range of 65 to 75 parts per billion to try to protect americans health. I am taking comment on setting the level to below 60 parts per billion. I am very mindful of the fact that my Science Advisors have indicated that it should be on the table as well as folks here at epa who have looked at this issue. So 60 is