and they are concerned about our recommended modification. they would prefer not to go back to the c2 district because they feel that is a little out of date and that the nc district would be more appropriate. so let me tell you about our recommended change and let me also say if you don t feel like the mood identification needs to be incorporated this week, that s something we can wait. we have another piece of legislation coming before you next week and we can consider and do a little bit more look into it and talk to you next week if that s your preference. but in this case we feel it would provide the coherency to the district and we have interpretation is that refer to both nc and c-2, so there s discrepancy about the control is currently in the definition of the rc district. it says commercial uses in this area should be permitted as described in the c2. so that s inconsistent with other places in the code where it refers to the nc district. so we feel there are a numbe
discrepancy about the control is currently in the definition of the rc district. it says commercial uses in this area should be permitted as described in the c2. so that s inconsistent with other places in the code where it refers to the nc district. so we feel there are a number of things pointing towards the which 2. and also you have should know that since we have made this change about whether the underlying zoning should refer to the nc districts, or the c2, we have only processed two conditional use authorization by this commission and both of those were approved, so there for we feel that the controlled that would allow this permissively are appropriate. and as mr. barns prescribed, the ordinance will be at the last use committee next week, so your recommendation is important today so you may have an opportunity to weigh in on the legislation. that concludes my report oh, one other thing, whether we are referring to the underlying nc or c2 only affects whether the us