on the line. nato is going to stand together, and we re going to defend ourselves. now, that doesn t mean we can t talk to the russians. even during the heat of the cold war and the height of the cold war, we did have conversations. and there are some areas where we can have a discussion about what we can agree upon, what we disagree. but this is the important thing, chris. you ve got to understand in your own mind what you can give and what you can t give. and ironically one of the president s criticisms of the iran deal was that president obama was so eager for a deal, he closed his eyes to problems. and that s certainly not a mistake we should repeat here. of course they re going to have that private meeting, and you can almost feel what s going to happen, secretary. they re going to go in. trump is going to come out. he s going to say, i said, this, this, this, and within hours it s going to leak from the kremlin side that that didn t happen. now, problem back here at home. how t
senate bipartisan agreement. a 97-2 vote today in support of nato. so maybe the president would be wise to heed the words of another donald. donald tusk, the head of the european union. he said this. i would like to address president trump directly, who for a long time now has been criticizing europe almost daily. the america, appreciate your allies. after all, you don t have that many. all right. so where do things stand with our allies tonight? we ve got donald trump heading to belgium. he s got a summit with nato there. he s got the british prime minister. and then he has russian president vladimir putin. is he making the right play? let s discuss with republican congressman from virginia scott taylor on prime time. good to see you, sir. chris, always good to be with you. congratulations on your show. thank you, brother. good to have you here with me. now, it is true that other member states don t meet their 2% requirement. in fact, most of them don t.
you re never going to be able to convince people that this guy is not qualified. that s not the point. the point is on issue after issue that is important to the american people, where the majority of american people are on one side, whether it has to do with a woman a right to choose, whether it has to do with health care, he s been on the other side. this is a very dangerous moment for the country and for the prestige of the court. i think the president of the united states in a situation like this, when the republicans stole a seat and gave him one, and now he gets to do the swing vote as well, i think for him to suspect someone like this he s not the worst, but he s the best of a horrible list. it s going to blow up in our faces going forward. so quickly, chris i had the last word, buddy. i got to go. > i ve been talking about the institution in the senate. it s sad to see. i wish there was a 60-vote minimum still. they could do it tomorrow. uh-uh. david urban, don t yo
june 20th is when we saw president trump s executive order that he was going to fix the problem. of course that s not what that fugazi executive order was about and i m going to take you through that later. today was an important day. you had a court out in california say they had to reunite at least some of the youngest kids by today, and they missed the deadline. and that is the beginning of a great debate with van jones and david urban. so let s get it on right now. david, must you own that what we are seeing is more proof that this is incompetence at a minimum, insensitivity in the main, and maybe a desire to be harsh playing out in realtime? yeah. so, chris, just like secretary chertoff said, look, let s first we could do better. we should be doing better. he said a lot more than that,
hold on. the democrats, senator bob casey of my state, whom i m friends with as well, very disappointed. three hours before, four hours before the president even nominated said, i m voting against him. you got to go through the process, but that process is largely bogus. guess what happens, chris. when he gets asks, do you think roe v. wade, how should it have been decided? judge, how do you think roe v. wade should have been decided? if he says, i can t answer that question, it s already there, then you know he s not going to be forth coming. what did elena kagan they all play the same game. but now van is saying he s so important because the seat he s filling. elena kagan wasn t important? they re all important. we got to where we are today with 51 votes because of harry reid. no, because the republicans were being [ overlapping voices ] van jones, last word. last word here, listen.