endure, and that it s a lot bigger than any of us and live hopefully a great deal longer than any of us, our children s children. i do think it s important to try to understand law according to its original understanding. so you don t agree with mccullick adapting to the crisis of human affairs. no, senator. so you do agree. well. i just want a yes or no, that s all. these are complicated issues that take more than a yes or no respectfully and what i would say is the constitution doesn t change. the world around us changes. we have to understand the constitution and apply it in lying of our current circumstances. that s what we re trying to do as judges, so for example one of my favorite case in this area is
sometimes majoritytively, i don t think there s a judge alive who doesn t want to know something about its original meaning as enacted. and i don t think this is an ideological thing. i look at decisions like jones, which we have talked about. or decisions like heilo, the thermal imaging of a home, the supreme court goes back and looks at the original history and says it s equivalent to peeping toms which of course would be a search, the constitution is no less protective today of people s liberties than it was 200 years ago or look at crawford and the right to confront witnesses and not just have pieces of paper flying in evidence that you can t confront reasonably, to cross examine your opponent fund mental right of the sixth
victory. the optics were terrific, but now we re arguing over the actual numbers, and that s going to diminish his message on this. indiana taxpayers should also smack each other on the back when they see each other at the grocery store because they re really the ones that helped save this. 7 million of taxpayers money went toward that and 1300 jobs are still going to mexico. so, you know, i think this just plays into these are things that a president-elect, a future president, should not be doing is picking which company he s going to essentially go after. we should be thinking about the economy for the entire country. we shall see which is the next winner, which is the next loser because if this is the path, a lot of folks are going to be lining up to raise their hands to say, he look at us over here. great to see you. rick, thank you. appreciate youtime. want to give you another look at the microsoft pulse question for today and it has to do with this twitter feud with the un
up. it s important. i want to open up the truth about benghazi. reporter: however an incident record obtained by cnn and first reported by the washington post revealed inconsistencies in jones account. in his book and to cbs, he said he went to the hospital after the attack where he saw steven dead body, and then returned to the compound, scales a wall and assaulting one of the militants. the incident report which also reviewsed his real name states those things never happened. in a statement, jones said the account in my book is consistent with what i gave to the fbi and u.s. authorities about what happened in benghazi. hi co-author damione lewis told is jones has never wavered. he s been consistent from the word go. noble that, he downplays his role. jones says he never saw or signed the incident report, but the version matches lies he told his supervisor to high the fact
it is the fact that the president s job is not to kick anybody s butt. it is to uphold justice. uphold the constitution. get things solved. this man, first of all, let me tell you who he was talking about. americans couldn t relate to that comment. he was not talking to anybody but, quite honestly these people. america s future now it was a conference that happened this week. van jones spoke at it. bill: this was a far left group. this was in washington. yes. crazy revolutionaries. bill: why woe bother talking to them? that s his power base. this week van jones said there is a pivot point in america. something has changed this week with the progressive movement when the administration and the white house has decided they are going to be progressives with us. then he said that we need to get out in the streets. bill: this is jones saying this. this is jones. i want you, bill, i m going to give you some homework. this is van jones organization called storm. he co-founded it i