Windylea Farm Reaches New Heights on NYRA Circuit
bloodhorse.com - get the latest breaking news, showbiz & celebrity photos, sport news & rumours, viral videos and top stories from bloodhorse.com Daily Mail and Mail on Sunday newspapers.
persons. that s part of my judicial oath. so do you see it as your textualism, would you-p apply i to these as well. senator, what i m trying to say is everyone is equal in the eyes of the law. i m just trying to figure out this, because i think for some things a lots of people who subscribe to this theory they say we can have originalism for some cases but not others and seems to me when you look at some opinions that use originalism that you have and some don t, but well senator if i might just respond to that. uh-huh. i would ask you to take a look at jones again. kilo, search of a home using a heat seeking device. ask you to take a look at maybe crawford the right to confront
but a as supreme court if you were to make this to overturn chevron would you consider the implications on all the cases in the u.s. and the uncertainty it would create. goodness, senator? yes. is this what you mean when you talk about maybe it s time to face the behemoth. when i see a problem, i tell my bosses about it like any good employee, an my job is listen look at some of the real world implications of what we re doing here. but be the boss if you were the supreme court justice and what rule do you think should replace it? should we have de novo review? is that better? senator, i don t prejudge it. what did preexist it was skid more, an opinion written by justice jackson, so there was
as inform bid the original understanding at the time it was adopted. do you share the view of the democratic attacks that originalism is somehow a quaint outdated notion of reading the constitution for what it says? senator, i want to say a few things about that, and i appreciate the opportunity. the first is that sometimes we in our discourse today our civil discourse use labels as a way to not engage with other people, to treat and divide us and them. and as a judge i just don t think that s a very fair, or appropriate, or useful way to engage in discourse. so i m worried about using labels in ways that are sometimes excuse for engagement with the ideas, stiems
vimarsana © 2020. All Rights Reserved.