their statement reads in part our policy approaches are not designed to harm china. nor do we seek to thwart china second amendment progress and about we are not the coupling are inwards but the same time we recognize economic resilience requires de- risking and diversifying for it will seek address the challenges posed by china s nonmarket policies and practices which distort the global economy. we will counter such as illegitimate technology transfer or data disclosure but let s bring enough boarding chang. he is a senior fellow at the gate stone institute also author of the great u.s. china tech war. in the coming collapse of china. so gordon, let s start here. how do you de- risk not decoupled from china? it is a fine line, arthel. de- risking is diversifying. that is happening already britt largely because companies have
legal challenge saying quote the bills champion have admitted they have no feasible plan for operationalizing this attempt to censor american voices. the bill s constitutionality will be decided by the courts. we will continue to fight for tiktok users and creators in montana whose livelihoods and first amendment rights are threatened by this egregious government overreach we must bring in gordon chang. he is against a senior fellow and author of the coming collapse of china. also author of the great u.s. and china tech war. so gordon, is that government overreach or is tiktok a national security threat? how is trident using the app to harm our country? to national security threats emanate from tiktok. there is the spy we learn for the buzzfeed reporting of last year all of their assurances
calls the extra territoriality of the u.s. dollar. make no mistake, a new world order is forming, an axis of evil is forming, and it s all happening because joe biden is weak and missing in action. america is not only leading from behind, we re not leading at all. and the world knows it. and these hostile regimes, these hostile actors that take full advantage of this. but i know many on the left they would rather talk about republicans are racist, sexist, homophobic, xenophobic, islamophobic, trans phobic. they want dirty air water and they want to kill grandma and grandpa and throw them over a cliff when they re in a wheelchair. not true. it is reaction. fox news contributor ari fleischer and the author of the coming collapse of china and the great us china tech war, gordon chang. gordon, let me let me start with you about this. i am watching sabr, the likes of which i ve never seen before. we may now within hours, perhaps days, have a confrontation in the south china sea with the c
will send this globe into a world of hurt and a global depression. jon, as lawmakers head back to that hill they tell fox her number one priority is to get taiwan the weapons it has already bought. it has been waiting for, for years. aishah hasnie in taipei taiwan, thank you. china s clearly building up its military. its largest navy in the world has had its largest army it s increase the size of its nuclear forces, fourfold by their 2035. we should be concerned about the progress former defense secretary sounding the alarm on chives in the u.s. must respond to its growing threat. for more on this and beijing s warning to the u.s. over taiwan let s bring in gordon tang gates out institute fellow and author of the collapse of china the great u.s./china tech war. why is taiwan important to the
protect that from happening. martha: the united states faces a new conflict with china. beijing threatening to fight back if kevin mccarthy meets with taiwan s president here in the u.s. that would be a serious provocation. gordon chang is here, author of the great u.s. china tech war . gordon, it s expanding just beyond a tech war in many different areas. i want to play one more sound bite on general milley on russia and china s nuclear threat. watch. if you re talking about a serious conflict with a major power of war, realistically, putting china and russia together is difficult. we re facing two nuclear armed great powers. so the principles of the called war of deterrence still obtain but it s more complicated. two versus one. yeah, this is utter disrupt