impressive macro intervention, macroeconomic interventions in recent american history. in the last hundred years. rh perhaps mr. hayes is not. ha aware of the current oecd projections. look, it doesn t takeit doesn a ph.d. in economics from stanford to know that under bide n, americans are poorer. spoorational debt ha skyrocketed and china continues to threaten our position in the world. so no amou no amount of spin, nt of happy talk from their press attache is that the other mak cables are going to make those inconvenient facts disappear.er here to discuss, arier fleischer, former white house pres white s secretary, and benlarge of domenech, editor at large of the spectator. both are fox news contributors.t ben, let s startchin on the china question. what s going on here? i mean, there couldn t reallyrro be more affronts to america that occurreveeed over the past three or four months from the hacking to the spy balloon of to the buzzing of our aircraft. other are just opaq
government hack is misplaced. it happens all the time. the question is, what is the administration s motive here? i think we know. this has far reaching implications. it s not just college admissions. we re talking about diversity, equity, inclusion. what are the conversations that you all are having with the private sector? there is no reason to use this as an excuse to go backwards. companies should not fall victim to the attacks of the right on diversity. laura: they were right to be scared because republicans thankfully are not letting up. today 13 state attorneys general sent a letter to fortune 500 corporations demanding that they end affirmative action practices or face legal consequences. saying that the supreme court s recent decision should place every employer and contractor on notice of the illegality of racial quotas and race-based preferences in employment. joining me now is a man leading
joining me now is the manlitn leading that coalition, tennessee attorney jonathan scarnati. jonathan, do you expectjonatn corporations that are so tight with the democrats on so many issues now, including on sn on the china question that they re going to fall in line here and just say, okare y you know, afraid of this letter? there s a lot t of outa lot misinformation that came out immediately after that decision . and i think anybody who reads it and looks at the relationships at betweenng title six covering education discrimination and title seven, covering employment discrimination has to think thattion, ha the fundamental pre here is the same, and that is you can t treatsamee people because of the color of their skin. so if corporate asians are going to continue on their track, at least they ll know that they should be concerned and that this decisionbe, while some people are reading it narrowly, really seems to speak to that fundamental principle in a very forceful way. fu
who serve and protect allies, who treat americans as surfs and peasants, who should do what they say, should be the atm s for the ruling class s priorities. i guess the bigger question, fundamental question, in 2024 for the elections is this. what are we going to do with this administrative state that has nothing to do with the american people and serving its interests and priorities? you cannot have a representative democracy and have an administrative state. they do not mix and i think that s one of the fundamental issues in 2024 and i think the american people are weighing up to that you can see it in the poll. they do not trust these institutions, which are the administrative state. laura: that s why they really are worried about trump. that and china. they are very worried about trump dismantling this entire system. imagine how the media would have acted if cocaine was fouled in the trump white house. i was thinking about those diagrams they did during covid to find out, trackin
that coalition, tennessee attorney general, jonathan jonathan, do you expect corporations that are so tight with the democrats on so many issues now, including on the china question, that they are going to fall in line here and just say, okay, we re afraid of this letter? there is a lot of misinformation that came out immediately after that decision. i think anybody who reads it and looks at the relationship between title 6 covering education discrimination and title 7 covering employment discrimination, has to think that the fundamental principle here is the same. that is, you can t treat people differently because of the color of their skin. so if corporations are going to continue on their track at least they will know that they should be concerned, and that this decision, while some people are reading it narrowly, really seems to speak to that fundamental principle in a forceful way.