Percent only on Public Transit much better promotions can lead to a integrated citywide system neighborhoods need to weigh in for study one hundred and 73 thousand is not a small sum if we were to study the improvements for the City Projects that could be implemented quickly and the instead of the studies that were cut city anyone else who wants to speak please step forward. Im for the central subway and i want you to approve the funding for it. And also expanding to north beach and inform Fishermans Wharf. I live on the f line its crowded with toufrtsdz going to Fishermans Wharf so this is ideal for it to go to Fishermans Wharf. I find it funny with the north beach people have opted the central subway and they still come out and how far rank you guys about the subway thats wrong the subway is going to be built and we should go favorite to north beach and into Fishermans Wharf. Thank you thank you anyone else who wants to speak. Seeing none, Public Comment is closed. Id like to ask if
The meeting will come to order good morning, everyone this is the San Francisco Transportation Authority plans Programs Committee this is the meeting of tuesday, march 18, 2014. Our clerk is erica chang could you please call the roll supervisor breed. Supervisor kim. Supervisor mar. Supervisor yee. laughter thank you id like to thank Jessie Larson and others for brooet us on sfgovtv. Item 12 the Citizens Advisory Council report. I know that supervisor kim was going to make comments about the unfortunate news of joseph passing. Actually, i was going to do any memoriam at the full Board Meeting i was hoping after the Committee Report we could have a moment of silence this is a time of vice chair flanagan used to do his report and bryan larkin from the cac. Im sorry supervisor campos. I know were going to do something at the board but i want to acknowledge mr. Flanagan i know he really cared about this agency and i have yet to find anyone that is more passionate about serving people and w
Systems and the pattern that would shape the subway station. Its looking at a few divvied alignments if we look at the geographic and it looks like it wouldnt be a feasible option and at a high level its doing some potential impacts for improvements and Economic Conditions that would be facilitated by this subway estimation and also looking at construction ability as i said before and the costs and Funding Options including the fundamental rating criteria which are back of the envelope stated would be fairly competitive and since this initial study feeds into the sfmta relatively past study we will get this study done in short order. It seems like a lot of people money to spend but hopefully it this will get done in july so the capacity study will be studied in conjunction with many options we have people from the mta to comment here if i want them to supervisor campos. Just a capture quick questions he in terms of the money who is going to do the work . Who is how are you planning to
Round during february and got great feedback and learned some of the idea were unpopularity so we spent the summer trying to understand the performance against the goals. When we came back and did our second round of outreach we completed an evaluation and compared two options to form the highest alternatives of the bridge and taking the underground from approximately st. Francis cycle through park merced and traveling over highway one and a bridge connecting to randolph street. Some of the connections improve the reliability of the m and also a lot more capacities on the line weve enable 3 and 4 car Train Services that is a benefit that ripples through market street. Also big improvements to the safety distance across the street appraise for places where pedestrians cross the street and prove the quality of life. I mentioned we did two rounds of outreach we reached the stakeholders from all the parts of corridor from west portal down to the o m i and worked the 3 landlords on the west
Transportation improvements which the m line integration was one of them. The purpose was to look at taking the m over to the west side of the street so that the crossing would be straight. The image here shows what that looks like as far as the density of the land where it becomes visible. Ill talk about the existing needs not corridor. Several big ones related to transportation the first one is about the speed and reliability traveling 9 and a half Miles Per Hour conflicts with the vehicles. A second oh, that looks better the second need is the access to transit we are we have a high ridership stop at the university and johnstown and all the folks boarding there if the station happened to be the highest ridership you have thousands of students crossing the highway 6 percent of the facility accidents occur here. So building on a version of American People you got to the park merced agreement taking them over to the west side of the street. The idea here was to look at it building upon