Agenda item up to two minutes and be in a quiet location and speak clearly and slowly and mute computers or radio. Item 1, call to order roll call. Director tsen. Here. Director dunlop . Perhaps you have unmute. Sounds like hes having an issue with his tablet. If hes in the meeting he can see it. Go to the upper left hand corner of the screen theres a circle with an i that says event information and at the bottom theres an attendee i. D. If you dial in and enter that attendee i. D. When prompted you should be able to access the meeting by audio and hopefully it will merge with your panelist i. D. As well. Can staff people perhaps phone him or text him. If he cannot join by video can he join by phone . Yes, theres instructions i just gave where he can use audio to dial into the meeting as a panelist but in order to do that he has to be in the meeting to access the unique attendee i. D. Otherwise hell call in but hell end up as an attendee and appear as a callin user like the public. Tho
It happened further down on king street i was clarifying it will this extend down to the point where this incident occurred . I dont know if theres a visible theres a visible of the project location and its in the enclosure which is the prop k enclosure for item 4. Its on since you guys are looking online its on page 73 of the enclosure its on page 11 of telephone of the actual allocation requests ill put it on the overheads as well so you can see the project location is quite willing mid block to the intersection at the third. Its after the mid block crossing. Okay. So this will extend a full bike lane from where the bike lane disappears in the middle of the street all the way to third which doesnt extend to third street. Not in this project. The description is mentioned are those there between second and third or past third street. This is replacing the shadows in this with striping and primarily stripping and is there a man plan to extend this further west. Let me invite jennifer fr
Round during february and got great feedback and learned some of the idea were unpopularity so we spent the summer trying to understand the performance against the goals. When we came back and did our second round of outreach we completed an evaluation and compared two options to form the highest alternatives of the bridge and taking the underground from approximately st. Francis cycle through park merced and traveling over highway one and a bridge connecting to randolph street. Some of the connections improve the reliability of the m and also a lot more capacities on the line weve enable 3 and 4 car Train Services that is a benefit that ripples through market street. Also big improvements to the safety distance across the street appraise for places where pedestrians cross the street and prove the quality of life. I mentioned we did two rounds of outreach we reached the stakeholders from all the parts of corridor from west portal down to the o m i and worked the 3 landlords on the west
Transportation improvements which the m line integration was one of them. The purpose was to look at taking the m over to the west side of the street so that the crossing would be straight. The image here shows what that looks like as far as the density of the land where it becomes visible. Ill talk about the existing needs not corridor. Several big ones related to transportation the first one is about the speed and reliability traveling 9 and a half Miles Per Hour conflicts with the vehicles. A second oh, that looks better the second need is the access to transit we are we have a high ridership stop at the university and johnstown and all the folks boarding there if the station happened to be the highest ridership you have thousands of students crossing the highway 6 percent of the facility accidents occur here. So building on a version of American People you got to the park merced agreement taking them over to the west side of the street. The idea here was to look at it building upon
Committee requiring our action, however, we recommended you only consider one appointment. This vacancy is from the term inspirations of robert from 7 and the recent expiration of mr. Flanagan. I see no questions. Supervisor yee so several people have impressed interest for being appoint and the people r that have stepped forward are all good candidates but the person that i felt is basically stood above them i will be supporting is john larson. And was really great to have met him and had a discussion with him because during that discussion it what i saw was the sincerity and his commitment to the issues. So i appreciate is if the rest of the committee would also support him thank you supervisor yee. Any candidates for this district 78 position if anyone wants to make a statement please come forward and well open this up for Public Comment. Good morning, chair mar and members. Im john larson im asking to be considered for the vacancy on the transportation authority. Im a 17 year resid