comparemela.com

Cheque Bouncing News Today : Breaking News, Live Updates & Top Stories | Vimarsana

Can cheque dishonour proceedings be closed without consent of complainant? Lack of clarity in law

In the present scenario, the complainant gets arbitrary power to ask for an amount which is much higher than the cheque amount and the applicable interest on it.

Damodars prabhuDishonour of chequesCheque dishonour proceedingsSection 138 negotiable instruments actDamodars prabhu vs sayed babalal hMeters amp instruments private limitedv kanchan mehtaR kalaiyarasi vc jaipalMs som distilleries ltdv state of mpNayati medical pvt ltd amp orsv as pharmaRani gaurv state of upRe expeditious trial of cases under section 138 ni actAnuradha kapoor amp orsv state of maharashtra orsSection 147 negotiable instruments actNani actCheque bouncingSupreme court

Rajkumar Santoshi denies cheque bouncing charges, plans to appeal against 2-year jail term |

Filmmaker Rajkumar Santoshi denies cheque bouncing charges and plans to appeal against the two-year jail term. Get the latest updates on the case and Santoshi's reaction.

Ashok lalAamir khanSunny deolPiyush bhojaniRajkumar santoshiPreity zintaFilmmaker rajkumar santoshiAamir khan productionsLegal troubleLahore 1947Jamnagar courtJail termCheque bouncing

Filmmaker Rajkumar Santoshi Gets 2 Years in Jail for Cheque Bouncing

Filmmaker Rajkumar Santoshi faces trouble after a Jamnagar court sentences him to 2 years in jail and imposes a fine of Rs 2 crore. - Filmmaker Rajkumar Santoshi Gets 2 Years in Jail for Cheque Bouncing - Read Details Here

Ashok lalPiyush bhojaniAamir khanPreity zintaRajkumar santoshiSunny deolFilmmaker rajkumar santoshi getsCheque bouncingRead detailsRajkumar santoshi getsNegotiable instrumentsAamir khan productionsRajkumar santoshi jailRajkumar santoshi cheque bounce caseRajkumar santoshi cheque bounce 2 years jailRajkumar santoshi jail updates

Cheque Bounce Case: Bengaluru Court Tells Karnataka Education Minister Madhu Bangarappa To Pay Rs 6 96 Crore Fine or Go to Jail

Bengaluru Special Courts for People’s Representatives has issued an order convicting Karnataka Education Minister Madhu Bangarappa in connection with a cheque bounce case from 2011 and imposing a Rs 6.96 crore fine. Cheque Bounce Case: Bengaluru Court Tells Karnataka Education Minister Madhu Bangarappa To Pay Rs 6.96 Crore Fine or Go to Jail.

Basanagouda patil yatnalMadhu bangarappaHigh courtVideo pvtBengaluru special courtsKarnataka education minister madhu bangarappaMinister madhu bangarappaChief minister siddaramaiahNew year celebrationsRestrictions would drive people outsidePatil yatnalRajesh exportsWipro files case against formerBengaluru civil court after he movesAkash audio video pvt limitedBengaluru court

Director not vicariously liable under Section 138 NI Act for cheque bouncing if company acquitted: Kerala High Court

The Kerala High Court held that when a company is not convicted for the offence of cheque bouncing under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, its Directors cannot be held vicariously liable for the same offence

Managing directorKerala high courtKerala hcKerala high court newsKerala hc newsSection 138 of negotiable instrument actSection 138 of ni actSection 138Directors not vicariously liable for offence of cheque bouncing if companyVicarious liabilityAbsence of company liability means directors are not accountableDirectors not held responsible if the company is acquitted in cheque bouncing casesDirectors not vicariously liable if the company is acquittedKerala high court section 138 of negotiable instrument actLegal newsKerala hc cheque bouncing

vimarsana © 2020. All Rights Reserved.