Mr. White is it necessary for us to go through them again. The audio the Deputy Director recorded the first 3 items not necessary okay turning to oh, no, i have to call any comment on the minutes and i will hearing none, call the question again. All in favor, say i. I. Any opposition hearing none, the minutes as amended by commissioner kopp and myself are approved turning to item number 4 is a discussion and possible action to approve Ethics Commission regular meeting of for calendar 2017 this is a new procedure of that the executive director has suggested to give rather than giving the notices once a month giving the Public Awareness of agreed dates assuming at dates on the calendar suggest in the attachment so one can plan over the 12month period. Any discussion. No as you point out commissioner keane not a requirement but keeping on the policy agenda as well as trying to enhance engagement the public ass are dates that conform with the requirement in the by laws and accepting over t
All right. Welcome everyone to our rules committee of monday, december 12, 2016, im katie tang chair our clerk is derrick overview vonlz from sfgovtv thank you Nona Melkonian and Charles Kremenak to my left is commissioner coppel and joined by commissioner mar and to any far left is commissioner avalos like to point out supervisor avalos and mr. Clerk, any announcements . Yes. Electronic devices. Completed speaker cards and documents to be included should be submitted to the clerk. Items acted upon today will appear on the tuesday, january 12, 2016, board of supervisors agenda unless otherwise stated. All right. Thank you and joined by sxhafshg to let you know we have a lot before us today but commissioner cohens has a 1 30 Land Use Committee trying to get through that mr. Richie item one. 9 members for the february 2015 to the balboa Advisory Committee 9 seats and 10 applicants and our last rules committee on thursday we held a hearing and heard into some of the applicants and United
Welcome again to the special meeting of the San Francisco Ethics Commission for confess 19 it is my understanding that items one and 2 and 3 up to the point where we were recorded they just were not shown on television and mr. White is it necessary for us to go through them again. The audio the Deputy Director recorded the first 3 items not necessary okay turning to oh, no, i have to call any comment on the minutes and i will hearing none, call the question again. All in favor, say i. I. Any opposition hearing none, the minutes as amended by commissioner kopp and myself are approved turning to item number 4 is a discussion and possible action to approve Ethics Commission regular meeting of for calendar 2017 this is a new procedure of that the executive director has suggested to give rather than giving the notices once a month giving the Public Awareness of agreed dates assuming at dates on the calendar suggest in the attachment so one can plan over the 12month period. Any discussion. N
I also hear what you say about the numbers should not drive the entire conversation but i do think it is important to understand where there is flexibility in the numbers. I do know how well we have done with conservation. I know we have our contractual agreements, but i would like to have a better understanding of what numbers we could do better on and to try and approach this very critical question of the health of the river and meeting our supply needs from a perspective of what we can do being the San Francisco we are, being the Technology Center we are, having the public support expertise and input that we do and having the invitation from the state that we really be partners and leaders in the effort. Thank you. Mr. Richard. Yes, i would make a comment that there issomebody mentioned there is a group called the bay area water steward that we met with from time to time usually roughly quarterly or twice a year so we are about due for another meeting so we will make that a priority