Structure. Im just in complete opposition. I think that there should be more. I also wanted to go back to what saved had spoken to about his friend who traveled here from sacramento starting her commute at 4 00 a. M. In the morning and it took her five years to find housing in San Francisco. I think thats because she couldnt find Affordable Housing in the first place and i dont think that this project would have met that need and it took her five years of struggling to find it and i think this is just the complete end to what would work. Thank you. Next speaker, please. Hi, my name is emma sterns. I lived in the city my whole lyft life. I am here in opposition to the 400 divisadero project as proposed. This project failed to meet the needs of divisadero community. 20 affordability in new housing is not enough for 37 units of Affordable Housing out of 186 units. This project is seeking five conditional use approval yet contains no benefit, Community Members. The project fails to meet ne
Than San Francisco in 1919 and they did build working class housing. They built 200,000 units in vienna by taxing the wealth i. But that seems to be off the table. 20 is more gentrification. Thats what that is. Only 20 and those affordable units, im sure, that poor working class students at city college and other places are not going to be able to have get into those affordable units. Affordability by your standards excludes poor, working class people. There are a lot of signs up in San Francisco for workers. Workers are needed. But theyre not able to get them. Why is that . They cant afford to live here. Were not talking about highpaid workers, were talking about regular, working people. Service workers, hotel workers, they cant afford to live here so theyre forced to commute. You are forcing people to commute to live in San Francisco because they cant afford to live here. This had been rejected. We should demand 100 affordability and say the billions should pay for it and it should b
Theyre being driven out. There is a way of having public working class housing. Very mysterous ways. Guess whats you make the billionaires pay for it. San francisco has more billionaires than any other city. The mayor of San Francisco and the politicians are not interested in going after the billionaires. Now there is a city that solved the problem, vienna. If people want to google how vienna solved its housing crisis they had a housing crisis worse than San Francisco in 1919 and they did build working class housing. They built 200,000 units in vienna by taxing the wealth i. But that seems to be off the table. 20 is more gentrification. Thats what that is. Only 20 and those affordable units, im sure, that poor working class students at city college and other places are not going to be able to have get into those affordable units. Affordability by your standards excludes poor, working class people. There are a lot of signs up in San Francisco for workers. Workers are needed. But theyre
i don t think they would be so eager to die house of the dragon, streaming exclusively on macs hello everyone. you re on cnn newsroom. i m alice and camerota in new york and we do begin with breaking news president biden is back at camp david tonight he survived founded were told by his family this meeting had been planned for months, but it is fair to say that there are serious conversations we can imagine happening there tonight we do have new reporting this hour at what is taking place at camp david and what the president is being urged to do. cnn s priscilla alvarez and isaac we re are here with us. priscilla, let me start with you. what have you learned while the president has been huddling with his family? i can t david for this previously scheduled visit, but of course it came at a critical juncture and senior biden advisers are telling cnn that he has been encouraged by his family to stay in the race and that they are often bring their support. now we know the presi
three-to-one. today. five good things listen wherever you get your podcasts a major decision from the supreme court, already having implications when it comes to january 6, defendants in a 6-3 decision, the court ruled the justice department actually overstepped by filing obstruction charges against people who rioted at the capitol, dozens of people, of course, have already been convicted and sentenced. and we ve just learned that a federal court in dc is already reopening some of the cases. cnn chief legal affairs correspondent paula reid and cnn senior crime and justice reported katelyn polantz joining us now with more on the decision of what happens next. so paula first walk us through this decision this decision today, this impacts potentially hundreds of people who have been charged in connection with january 6, and the attorney general issued a statement today saying that the justice department will take appropriate steps to act on this opinion today, but they also