rights la of the year to share his personal views about religion. but the problem is alito and the other right-wing justices are imposing their personal, moral and political beliefs on all of us. and new reports show how they re using made up plaintiffs in recent supreme court cases to do it. also tonight, new details on donald trump s efforts to over turn his election loss in arizona. amid new reporting that jack smith is giving close scrutiny to trump s clown car team of lawyers. plus america post dobbs. north carolina s 12 week abortion ban take effect as republicans in ohio make it much harder to protect abortion rights even though a majority of the ohioans support those protections. and we begin on the eve of the fourth of july. during a time in america where a lot of people are seeing their freedoms being taken away. and that is in large part due to the supreme court of the united states. mainly the court s six conservative judges whose decisions last week peeling
250 officers involved and a reward totaling $80,000 for tips that bring him in. they say the man they re looking for is armed and dangerous and could be literally anywhere. i pretty much can guarantee he s contacted some of his friends. we just don t know what friends they are. that s what we need in the public, is any type of information. right now we re just running into dead ends. do you all believe that the suspect is still in the area? we do not know. like i said, right now we have zero leads. that attack happened on friday night. since then ten more mass shootings have taken place across the u.s. including eight yesterday. among them, a shooting at a house party in mississippi that left a 16-year-old and 18-year-old dead and a 19-year-old under arrest. at almost the exact same time gunfire broke out at a house party in massachusetts killing an 18-year-old and wounding five others. in south carolina, nine people shot, most teenagers after gathering in a park arou
has called him to rage, he attacks this man s wife, jack smith s wife. what we are seeing is jack smith determined to pursue justice without fear or favor. and i think everyone who loves freedom and truth and law should be happy about that. and the last thing i ll say, joy, to your question, this justice department is following the facts wherever they lead. and that s what we should all hope for in any criminal investigation. you know, and there s also the case making attorneys get attorneys is what maga stands for. i wonder how fearful, charles, some of these attorneys ought to be. the jenna ellis, the strike force folks. because it does seem like they are like the justice department is zeroing back in on the fake electors scheme that a lot of trump s lawyers had something to do with.
inasmuch as with that case, with raffensperger, we have the phone call, we have the recording, we know what was said, we know it was clear. whereas with this case, it s kind of left up to the interpretation of the different accounts and other people on the call. as to the degree of pressure which was being placed on donald trump. legally what that s going to mean is everything comes back to the timeline. what did you know at the time that you made these calls? and then, what was said on the actual calls? so i think that is going to be the linchpin that determines whether a prosecution moves forward wrts to arizona, as compared to georgia, where you have the actual recording and you know what was said. good point. to stay with you just a second, charles, the other thing is, right, we don t know what trump might have to fear from what mike pence or doug ducey might say to jack smith. but there are other people. former trump campaign official, mike roman, who was involved in efforts to
make him try to go around the judge in that case or perhaps appeal to the 11th circuit or go to the district of new jersey. absolutely, i think the overarching goal is to pursue justice without fear or favor. to make sure that everyone and anyone who, with regard to the january 6th investigation, is criminally responsible. and with regard to the documents investigation, that people are held accountable for their crimes. and what would be that kind of a triggering event, charles, potentially? i think it would have to basically show that there was a substantial amount of documents that were being held in bedminster or that a significant amount of action pointing toward the illegality occurred at bedminster. we have evidence of one incident that we have seen dictated in the indictment, but if there are more, if that shows that that was also sort of a hub, if you