With zero tolerance for cheating. An immediate test of irans willingness to cooperate rests with the iaeas attempts to clarify evidence the International Observer group has on the potential military dimensions of irans programs. For several years, iran has refused to provide information or explanation to the iaea on past bomb efforts. This includes the Parchin Military base where iran has gone to Great Lengths to eliminate all traces of any clandestine activity, including demolishing buildings and including removing large areas of soil from the site. Irans willingness to come clean on its past Weapons Programs should be an acid test for western negotiators. We must ask, what good is striking an agreement and removing sanctions, our only leverage, if iran keeps a capacity to secretly build nuclear bombs. Unfortunately, u. S. Negotiators have already made a key concession that will complicate the task of verifying Irans Nuclear commitments. The interim agreement of last year would allow
Verification over several decades and the views i will be presenting are my own and not intended to represent views of those ive been associated with such as the department of defense and the Nuclear Treaty monitoring and verification. My statement draws in part on those experiences and on the Defense Science Board Task force report as well as the work of a nongovernmental task force on verification requirements for Nuclear Agreement with iran. Neither of the two task forces makes a judgment as to whether compliance with any particular Nuclear Agreement is ver fibl. Indeed, we do not yet know the details of the monitoring provisions that will emerge in the iranian agreement now under association or in such an agreement will be concluded. The Defense Science Board Task force report underscores that monitoring Nuclear Programs is very challenging. And that the technical capabilities to do so are limited. But the report suggests a number of steps that can be taken to make monitoring more
Help us close the achievement gap. I can tell you from being in the trenches and talking and seeing enough data so far to tell you, i guarantee you that will be the sixth one. About to beand its proven. I will give you an example. Project done in North Carolina in the 1970s. They did quality early child education. Aen done well, it inoculates child for three years. In this one, they went into the home every two weeks and taught the parents how to do homework with the kids. Those kids when tracked all the way through high school were graduating at much higher rates, going to college at much higher rates. Much less dropout rates. The home environment had changed. It had been changed. They were inoculated for the rest of their lives. Data . Ave those pieces of i just dont have enough. I know there will be enough data. Only good can come from involving them. Can i mandated for the schools . No. This goes under the premise of if the home environment does not change, can you close the achiev