Good afternoon, supervisors. Bruce [speaker not understood], city ask county surveyor. I think most of you have seen the center here today, but the summation is this on december 4th, 2013 we received two subdivision applications from Neighboring Properties on Mission Street at the intersection with third. First subdivision applications of fourunit air space parcel map proposed to divide assessors block 3 76, [speaker not understood], 738 Mission Street. This property currently houses he the contemporary Jewish Museum and the jesse squared garage. Subdivision would split lot 277 into four parcels. Parcel a would be a portion lying below ground for an existing garage. Parcel b would be the air space above the existing garage. Parcel c would be the space above the Jewish Museum and parcel d would be the air space below the Jewish Museum. The subdivision is necessary to convey parcel a and b to the developer who submitted the second ably indication. Second application would be project 797
Approve these parcel maps would also be inadequate. Theyre kind of an ipso facto, if it didnt work there, it wont work here. Now, the Planning Department assumes this is a third issue that your time period after certification by the eir, the only issue is whether there is new information, changed circumstances, or a change in the project that would require a subsequent or supplemental eir. And i disagree with that. Even if its true, i think there is such new information and ill get to that. I do disagree with that. I think this board has an opportunity to reconsider the adequacy of this eir under ceqa at this time because this approval involves a vesting tentative map which could have been approval last summer with the other ones. For whatever reason the project sponsor decided to delay it. And a vesting map that grants fundamental rights to develop. So, this eir should be judged on its own merits at this time. Rather than simply looking through the lens as section 21 16 of ceqa looks
Wanted to tell that mayor lee, racist, fascist, antisemitic. You evicted me on the street. I am 82 years old holocaust survivor, sleeping on the street and couldnt get Affordable House because you dont do anything. I apply to many of you. Again, i say you are fascist, racist and anti semitic and board of supervisors, too. Thank you. Any other members of the public wishing to speak on behalf of the appellant . As i mentioned before, whoever is clapping please stop clapping. We have a rule in the chamber that we dont interrupt our proceedings against either applause or hissing. So, with that, any other members wish to speak in support of the appellant . At this time why dont we now go to dpw and planning. Good afternoon, supervisors. Bruce [speaker not understood], city ask county surveyor. I think most of you have seen the center here today, but the summation is this on december 4th, 2013 we received two subdivision applications from Neighboring Properties on Mission Street at the inter
On item 22, supervisor yee . Aye. Yee aye. Supervisor avalos . Avalos aye. Supervisor breed . No. Breed no. Supervisor campos . Aye. He campos aye. Supervisor chiu . Chiu aye. Supervisor cohen . Cohen no. Supervisor farrell . Farrell aye. Supervisor kim . Kim aye. Supervisor mar . Mar aye. Supervisor tang . Tackv aye. ~ tang aye . Tang aye. Supervisor wiener . No. Supervisor wiener no. The item is a doddthv. [gavel] i think we need to call items 23 through 30. Item 23 is a public hearing of persons interested in the march 24, 2013 decision of public works approving a personal tent i have map for subdivision located 38 Mission Street. Item 24 is motion approving the decision of the department of public works and approving the tentative parcel map for a 4lot subdivision located at 738 Mission Street, assessors block no. 3706, lot no. 277; making environmental findings and findings of consistency with the general plan, and the eight priority policies of planning code, section 101. 1. Item
, in themy question energy sector, we dont differentiate between physical threats and Cyber Threats. We drill with the assumption that they will probably do both at the same time if it is a sophisticated attack. To be frank, the militarys response in its own protection seems to be focused on isolation as a tactic for dealing with the idea of the grid going down. I wonder if you could talk to that a little bit. As tempting as isolation is as a strategy for response, it also potentially makes security a lot more difficult if you have individual grids all over the place. If you could talk about isolation versus integration. Isolation works at a tactical level for immediate shortterm periods. It is not a comprehensive, sustainable strategy. It is this idea of, i will just shut the network down. It is not that it is a bad thing at the tactical level. If you are looking at a base, an installation as opposed to an entire grid or sector. In the long run, i think the right answer for us is goin