to represent chamber employees who wanted us to accompany them to the interviews that were requested by the investigators. the third was to make sure that the chamber and its employees were treated fairly. it s the last of those things that i want to address briefly. as you know, the special deputies on behalf of the attorney general issued 165-page report on tuesday at 11:00. this is not like an ordinary civil or criminal proceeding. there report will not be followed by a civil hearing or a criminal or trial to determine the accuracy of their conclusions, hold up they got there or to weigh the evidence. for the people in the chairman, this was the end of the line. this was what the attorney general and the investigators meant to have as effectively the
and then, b, effectsively given the back of its hand in a footnote. why is that important? there is a very serious legal issue about whether the attorney general s office is correct or not. and that seriously legal issue should have gotten more consideration in a report that reaches a conclusion about illegality. and that s one example. the second thing i want to talk about in terms of fairness is in terms of the transcript. many witnesses testified, many of them were chamber employees. many of them were interviewed without court reporters, many were interviewed with court reporters. it is now 76 hours since the press conference. not one of the witnesses not one of the lawyers has a copy of the transcript as we understand it of their own client s interview.
production the second part of our task was to represent chamber employees. they didn t choose other counsel who wanted us to accompany them to the interviews. that were requested by the investigators. the last thing i want to address briefly. of as you know, the special deputies on behalf of the attorney general issued 165 page report on tuesday at 11:00. as you all know this is not like an ordinary civil war criminal proceeding. their report will not be followed by a civil hearing or a criminal or trial to determine the accuracy of their conclusions, how they got there or to weigh the evidence. for the people in the chamber,
an enormous numbers of hard copy and electronic documents. the second part of our task is to represent chamber employees if they didn t choose other counsel that wanted us to accompany them to the interviews that were requested by the investigators. sure that the chamber and its employees were treated fairly. the last of those things that i want to address briefly. as you know, the special deputies on behalf of the attorney general issued 165-page report tuesday. this is not like a ordinary civil or criminal proceeding. their record will not be followed by a civil hearing or a criminal or a trial to determine the accuracy of their conclusions, how they got there or to weigh the evidence. for the people in the chamber, this is the end of the line. this is what the attorney general and the investigators
to the extent they want to move forward with impeachment, you now have an impossible standard for us because we are not given access to the evidence. now, i understand records have been provided to the assembly. we have asked them for that so that we can make an informed submission that adequately addresses the evidence and can point out areas where we believe there s been omissions or exculpatory evidence. i do also want to make another point on this, is that there are points in the report that talk about other chamber employees that believed a complainant. i do know and have been told by some other attorneys that they provided information that undermined the credibility of at least one complainant and questioned the motives. and somehow none of that far made it in the report.