and then, b, effectsively given the back of its hand in a footnote. why is that important? there is a very serious legal issue about whether the attorney general's office is correct or not. and that seriously legal issue should have gotten more consideration in a report that reaches a conclusion about illegality. and that's one example. the second thing i want to talk about in terms of fairness is in terms of the transcript. many witnesses testified, many of them were chamber employees. many of them were interviewed without court reporters, many were interviewed with court reporters. it is now 76 hours since the press conference. not one of the witnesses not one of the lawyers has a copy of the transcript as we understand it of their own client's interview.