Here on cspan3, well take you live now to a hearing on amtraks response to the coronavirus pandemic. This hearing is already in process. While possibly only saving amtrak 213 million. Overall, the damage could top 3 billion if amtraks planned nine months of Degraded Service stretches another quarter to a full year. Ill finish. Thank you. The amtrak community was hit especially hard because several airlines say theyll drop service when the c. A. R. E. S. Act expires. Thats 67 cities facing air cutbacks. Nearly half, 31 of them, would all flew the same, sacramento, tampa, these routes touch nearly every corner of our country. On the empire builder on eight states from illinois to washington, those towns face a nearly 400 million blow. The north south city of new orleans between louisiana now produce nearly 134 million in economic benefits. It could wipe out as much as 88 million of that. Simply put, this drastically reduced utility of a nationwide Network Operating three days a week, mak
Widely condemned around the world so i wanted to have the answers she gave us. Regina that you welcome to a conference on hollow you recently wrote an article about the controversial new security law that chinas going to impose on hong kong and you said this does not to necessarily spell the death of hong kong separate systems but youre taking a huge gamble backing this law arent you because beijing has done everything it can to prove that its not interested in those separate systems not interested in freedom of expression human rights or the rule of law is it. I dont think we need to come to a conclusion because china already has its own National Security law you know which is only a few pages long whats consists mainly of principles exhortations duties obligations. I think the fact that it needs it feels like its true and that a whole call version reflects its understanding that hong kong to version which is consistent with our common law system thats why painting is going ahead to a
Condemned around the world so i wanted to have you on says she gave us. That youre welcome to a conference on hello you recently wrote an article about the controversial new security law that china is going to impose on hong kong and you said this does not to necessarily spell the death of hong kong separate systems but youre taking a huge gamble backing this law onto because beijing has done everything it can to prove that its not interested in those separate systems not interested in freedom of expression human rights or the rule of law is it. I dont think we need to come to a conclusion because china already has its own National Security law you know which is only a few pages long whats consists mainly of principles exhortations duties obligations. I think the fact that it needs it feels like is true and that a whole cold version reflects its understanding that hong kong to russia which is consistent with our common law system thats why painting is going ahead to an actor in special
Of hong kongs judging my guest was regina if chair of the probating new Peoples Party she dismissed all the fears as priceless but the law is now in force and widely condemned around the world so i want to be on says she gave us. Regina welcome to a conference on. Hello you recently wrote an article about the controversial new security law that chinas going to impose on hong kong and you said this does not necessarily spell the death of hong kong separate systems but youre taking a huge gamble backing this law arent you because beijing has done everything it can to prove that its not interested in those separate systems not interested in freedom of expression human rights or the rule of law is it. I dont think we need to come to a conclusion because china already has its own National Security law you know which is only a few pages long what consists mainly of principles exhortations obligations. I think the fact that it needs it feels all playas true and thats the whole call version re
Condemned around the world so i want to be on says she gave us. A. Region that youre welcome to a conference on harlow you recently wrote an article about the controversial new security law that china is going to impose on hong kong and you said this does not to necessarily spell the death of hong kong separate systems but youre taking a huge gamble backing this law onto because beijing is not everything it can to prove that its not interested in those separate systems not interested in freedom of expression human rights or the rule of law is it. I dont think we need to come to a conclusion because china already has its own National Security law you know which is only a few pages long whats consists mainly up principles exhortations duties obligations. I think the fact that it needs it feels or pla is true and that a whole cold version reflects its understanding that hong kong to russia which is consistent with our common law system thats why painting is going ahead to an actor in spec