High schools during nonschool hours, so thats the issue that he picked. And thats the text of that radio address. Heres the thing, though. This was a radio address, it was audio only. He was going to do the radio address from his house in santa barbara, california. As they were setting up for him to give this address, as they were checking the audio levels and getting him ready to start, he didnt just say the top of his speech. He didnt just stay my fellow american, im pleased to tell you that i have signed legislation to blah, blah, blah. He didnt say that, which was the real first line of the radio address. When he was doing his sound check, while they were setting up his microphone. He started to do the first line but then he turned it into a joke. My fellow americans, im pleased to tell you today that ive signed legislation that will outlaw russia forever. We begin bombing in five minutes. He said that into the microphone. Everybody laughed. Were outlawing russia forever. The bombi
Yesterday. Is the president concerned that comments made by his staff came up in this lawsuit, comments by Stephen Miller saying that the second travel ban would have the same policy outcome as the first viewed by the judge in that case, get at yesterdays concerned is he concerned the mixed messaging coming up from the west wing staff . No, hes not. I think the department of justice will be pursuing avenues that will seek to remedy this. I think when you read through the courts ruling in hawaii in particular, it just doesnt seem to make sense. As i mentioned to gabby, the executive or second executive order was literally tailored so to go back and talk about statements that occurred, you know, in some cases well before, even the first one, seems to not be an accurate reading of the law. But ill let the department of justice, you know, be the ones that argue this and make the appropriate legal argument. Hunter. Olivia, im sorry. Your long list of the reports you mentioned, an accusation
To give this address, as they were checking the audio levels and getting him ready to start, he didnt just say the top of his speech. He didnt just stay my fellow american, im pleased to tell you that i have signed legislation to blah, blah, blah. He didnt say that, which was the real first line of the radio address. When he was doing his sound check, while they were setting up his microphone. He started to do the first line but then he turned it into a joke. My fellow americans, im pleased to tell you today that ive signed legislation that will outlaw russia forever. We begin bombing in five minutes. He said that into the microphone. Everybody laughed. Were outlawing russia forever. The bombing will begin in five minutes. After he did that sound check, somebody leaked the tape. And thats what he said. It was a joke. He had a sense of humor. Whats the big deal . The big deal it turns out was he was an american president and the subject matter was Nuclear Weapons. Do you know what happe
Shell be back monday. This is the american businessman to worry about them anymore then people are being killed in nice, in berlin this week, at the nightclub in may, in San Bernardino a year ago, in paris, brussels, it doesnt ring true to anybody that theyre not advancing. What does that have to do with Nuclear Weapons . Im going to give you the analogy. Us saying theyre contained and then attacking proves that everybody foo feels unsafe in a world with terrorists particularly in the case of isis are advancing, that theyre still wanting to do them harm. Hes trying, i think in his quest to keep us safe and secure, hes putting the world on notice that he will do what he thinks he needs to do to keep us safe and secure. By expanding our nuclear capability. Hes not trying to change a policy through twitter. Hes not trying to project what he will do as president. What hes merely saying is that this is a man who gets his Intelligence Briefings regularly, the pdb, president ial Daily Briefin
Democracy. And if they get that wrong, that is a much, much bigger deal, whether their motivations were pure or impure, when or whether they got that wrong is a bigger question than just which party won, wouldnt you agree . Senator, if a court errs as a matter of law, there are various remedies. There is a legislative remedy. Because theres always another law to be passed and another case to test. Every case comes on its own facts with its own record and can be analyzed anew. And then there is the law of precedent, which weve discussed. I wrote this 800 page book on. Makes a great door stop, gift for christmas. I got a really bad deal on royalties. Another way for the court to clean up after itself. Yeah. Thats what people suggesting. There is way to do that. Precedent is not an inexorible command. So the court can reverse itself. It happens. If a question were to come up regarding recusal on the court, how would we know that the partiality question in a recusal matter had been adequat