Jalen hurts is potentially an x factor, with what he can do in running this offense. His ability to throw and run. They have four running backs that they can use. The lines only going to get better week after week. Theyre going to be a tough out. Chris burnett takes a turn at punt returner. Hes got a little room. Thats out near midfield. What do you make of the s. E. C. . There were certainly some lows. Kirk well, arkansas came back and won that, by a point. Chris Mississippi State missing that chip shot at the end. Kirk georgia, thats a great win over north carolina. Wisconsin outplayed lsu most of that game and deserved to win. West virginia ends up beating missouri. Florida with a win. A m in overtime that was a great win over ucla. Its not that doesnt include the tennessee Appalachian State gait game on thursday night, which wasnt a Strong Performance by the s. E. C. Chris auburns defense doing a strong job against clemson, but still down by ten against the clemson tigers. And then
Increased by 50 since this law went into effect . Since this law has taken effect there is three new Surgery Centers that opened. There was evidence at the trial and the trial court knew that would happen and took that into account in making its findings. But there was evidence, including texas experience in 2003 following enact of the asc law for later abortions, for post16 week abortions, that show the market never adjusted and the rate at which those procedures occurred in texas was drastically diminished. One question about capacity and i dont wants to take your rubutal time but your cocounsel is also litigating a case like this in louisiana. In that case, the plaintiffs were able to put in evidence about the exact number of abortions performed at facilities. Why doesnt that done here . There is evidence in the record about the number of abortions that were performed on an annual bases, the geographic distribution of those abortions. Texas collects the statisticics a statistics and
So your point, im taking, is tt the two main Health Reasons show that this law was targeted at abortion. Thats absolutely correct. Thank you, counsel. Im. Is there any other medical condition, like taking the pills, that are required to be done in hospital . Not as a prelude to a procedure in hospital, but an independent, you know, i know there are cancer treatments by pills now. How many of those are required to be done in front of the doctor . None, your honor. There are no other medication requirements and no other outpatient procedures that are required by law to be performed in an asc. Thank you, counsel. General verrilli . Mr. Chief justice and may it please the court, the effects of the texas law in this case are much more extreme than those of any abortion law this court has considered since casey. It closes most abortion facilities in the state and exponentially increases the obstacles of women seeking abortions in the state on the basises of a medical justification that canno
Privile privileges to a hospital within 30 miles and requiring facilities have to hospital like standards is a violating their right. Whole Womans Health versus hellerstedt. Mr. Chief justice, may i appease the court. The texas requirements undermine the careful balance between statess legitimate interest in regulating abortion and woman ability to make their own decision. They create obstacles to abortion access. There is a preliminary question. Would you address that . That disclaim is for prudence. Lets take first the claim that was in the prior litigation. Lets assume they are separate claims. That was argued and decided. Why isnt it precluded . Your honor, it is not precluded because staff to the claim developed subsiquent. The new action is filled six days after the Supreme Court issues its decision in this case. You could have asked for supplement briefing. In abbot, the plaintiffs brought the new fact do is the court of appeals and the court of appeals said it would only consid
One way or the other about that. But i do want to what i but i think getting to the point of your honors question, i think the problem the District Court confronted here, and i think the reason the District Court acted reasonably, despite the presence of the severability clause and the severability clause provides an instruction that that every provision, every clause, every word, every application, every individual should be severed. And the problem is the problem with the kind that the court noted, i think, in the ayotte case, for a court trying to apply that, the courts got to go in and decide which collection of the many, many requirements there ought to stand and which shouldnt, and its its going to be invading Justice Alito well, its all general verrilli the states regulatory problems. Justice alito its work, but maybe the District Court should have done that work. I mean, i read through this, and i was surprised. I read through these regulations. I was surprised by how many are