Couldnt get the full accounting accounting. The 300 billion doesnt include come under budget how much is going into that basic research to find the basis for the major Mental Illness . Roughly 50 spirit what is your total budget . 1. 45. 12 are going to hiv. By the way, my state has ever had per capita incidence of hiv and my Patient Population a disproportionate number of hiv. I am absolutely where of the nature of the issue of hiv but it does seem, if we have too few dollars going to the Brain Initiative and youve got roughly 800 million going to something that basic research or something which is costing us at least 300 billion, probably far more, as important as the it seems like we should be throwing everything we have an understanding that basic sort of science regarding that. The 12 where does that come from . I mean i guess my priority, when i go back and look and we are spending 19,000 per death on hiv, ma ive a sense we probably spending probably 2000 her death on major Menta
U. S. Rate. I just hope that the department can be aggressive and forward leaning in partnering with the delegation and utilities to solve the problem. Its not a gas problem as you know, and i think its going its going to take an all of the above kind of strategy in terms of permitting and its a really urgent problem for the region and i assume you agree with that. Yes, in fact, the very first field hearings we had for the qer were in new england driven by the gas pipeline issue and the representatives of all six governors were part of that meeting. Frankly, the remarks made were such that the governors felt they, you know, were going to have this under control, and would take care of it. In fact, i understand that next year in 2016, that there will be a substantial expansion of capacity taking gas into the boston area through there but further north is a challenge. There, i dont know how this turns out, and happy to work with you, senator king, and the well, this is a problem of our s
Channel which i understand would open up the channel appropriately. I can go back and look again if youd like. Thats my understanding at least. Thank you. Secondly, the mox facility in charleston, South Carolina dr. Savannah river site. Theres a recent line at the Aerospace Corporation gave unfavorable to the project and out of line from reports from army corp of engineer and suggested another 30 years to completion opposed to eight years its taken to get so far depending on who you speak to. I think aerospace has 50 contractors say 65 and any thoughts on that one . I what experiences does the Aerospace Corporation have on the projects . Thats the first question, and, two, can we have transparency to assumptions because its a complicated project. Assumptions mean everything. Were happy, by the way on the last part, to have completely transparent briefings, what wed like to do on that, and the Aerospace Corporation has been a contractor quite frequently to the nsa part of d. U. E. In te
Roles. Creeri anda Senate Judiciary chair Chuck Grassley outlines his committees agenda. With live coverage of the u. S. House on cspan and the senate on cspan 2, on cspan 3 we show you the most relevant congressional hearings and then on weekends cspan 3 is home to American History tv with programs that tell our nations story, including six unique series. The civil wars 150th anniversary. American artifacts to discover what artifacts reveal about americas past, history bookshelf, the bestknown history writers and the presidency looking at the policies and legacies of our commanders in chief and our new series, real america, featuring archival government and educational films from the 1930s through the 1970s. Funded by your local cable or satellite provider, watch us on hd, like us on facebook and follow us on twitter. Since 2010, at least ten states have seen their largest wildfires on record according to the National Forest service. Coming up on cspan 3 at 10 00 a. M. Eastern a heari
Of the fence. The burglary, arson, extortion and use of explosives are determined by reference to the elements of the offense, a categorical analysis. I know we asked you to organize this vagueness issue. But when you were here before you didnt think that the statute was vague as applied to your client. As i remember your argument was its clear that your client did not fall within the residual clause largely because the offense that is at issue a possession offense and you argue that none of the specific offenses listed is a position offense. Youre correct your honor. When we were here last time it is plainly not included for the reasons you mention and others. Why do we have to get to this issue at all . Why do we have to reach out to decide a constitutional question . Certainly, your honor, the fact that it is excluded it is at odds of the other courts. Something that is not in the plain definition but held to fall in the plain definition reveals the vagueness of the residual clause.