this was twa 800, the same 747 seen at jfk airport in new york two years before the tragedy. this is twa 800 now. most of the fuselage reassembled at an ntsb hangar outside of washington, d.c. without the wings, tail or cockpit. you can actually see where the plane came apart. you can see the dark smoke parts behind the rip in the plane s body, and ahead of it, the front part is clean, and that is where the first class section and cockpit fell off. the explosion was here. in the center fuel tank. i m really struck by the size. you could really park a couple of cars in here. the fuel tanks are the size of about a two-car garage. is the center tank below the
but now, 17 years later, a new documentary claims to have proof to support a not so new conspiracy theory about twa flight 800. what we do show in documentary is solid proof that there was an external detonation, but we also have corroborating information from the radar data. primary conclusion was that the explosive forces came from outside of the airplane, not the center fuel tank. would that statement have been in your analysis? if i got the write one. according to its press release the film due to be released in july is quote a stunning expose detailing how the official investigation was derailed. and the agenda was that this
747 seen at jfk airport in new york two years before the tragedy. this is twa 800 now. most of the fuselage reassembled at an ntsb hangar outside of washington, d.c. without the wings, tail or cockpit. you can actually see where the plane came apart. you can see the dark smoke parts behind the rip in the plane s body, and ahead of it, the front part is clean, and that is where the first class section and cockpit fell off. the explosion was here. in the center fuel tank. i m really struck by the size. you could really park a couple of cars in here. the fuel tanks are the size of about a two-car garage.
within the scope of science back in 1996, you know, we d take a look at it. but this group of people are not those scientists. james continues to pooh-pooh what you call evidence in your documentary. dr. charles wetly has signed our petition. he s the chief medical director and chief. he s not low level. hank hughes, chairman of the airplane reconstruction interior group. he laid out the grid to reconstruct the even tire plane. i mean this is high-level person. primary conclusion was the explosive forces came from outside the airplane, not the center fuel tank. would that statement have been in your analysis? if i got the right one. let me tell you this is an honest investigation and it is
within the scope of science back in 1996, you know, we d take a look at it. but this group of people are not those scientists. james continues to pooh-pooh what you call evidence in your documentary. dr. charles wetly has signed our petition. he s the chief medical director and chief. he s not low level. hank hughes, chairman of the airplane reconstruction interior group. he laid out the grid to reconstruct the even tire plane. i mean this is high-level person. primary conclusion was the explosive forces came from outside the airplane, not the center fuel tank. would that statement have been in your analysis? if i got the right one. let me tell you this is an honest investigation and it is