Aau is above the law the Department Needs to restore Public Confidence beyond why the Planning Department of rebating permit violations exists the aau we all know their unlivable to change their predatory and callous practices of land use violations it is disturbing to me as to why the department is not activate the City Attorney and use the recommendations under the planning code in section 17 of one can only speculate why it is a matter of principle and justice thank you. Thank you. Next speaker, please. Im going to be using the overhead im not going to start until he sets it back at 3 pardon me. Im ready. My name is sieving ive been dealing with this case for 14 years on the overhead is the map that was the eir academy of arts red is housing the blue is Institutional Uses was the first map all im asking for the Planning Commission to take the opportunity to reset the hearing informational hearing with the ability for the public to give input on the report you got last friday or thus
Staff recommends that the commission make a specified findings to approve this project. Thank you. Im available for any questions you might have. Thank you. Project sponsor, please. Good afternoon, commissioners. Thank you very much for allowing us to present this afternoon. My name is bob tanedler. It is my pleasure to be before you to introduce the tehama [speaker not understood]. Architect our Landscape Architect from cmg Landscape Architecture, Isabelle Wade has helped us plan our plaza and open space integration. Brad paul has helped drive our Community Outreach. Wane hu has helped us understand the economic benefits of the project to the city and county of San Francisco. Sam louder has acted a senior [speaker not understood] and guided us through government interaction and make sure i dont embarrass myself up here today. Susan yogi and david from acom have handled Environmental Review brilliantly and Andrew Junius is our esteemed counsel. All of our team is here to answer questio
For our members and our contractors. Please consider it. Thank you. Thank you. [speaker not understood], with San Francisco tomorrow. A commendable worthy design, well thought out project. The issue i wish to raise is environmental quality. That not to add to the Developers Cost which is commendable, but that the city share an impact required by state law with regard to ceqa that has not been adequately presented. This is a question of cumulative development. All development occurring in the central city and around this project which the city lacks the mitigation resources and implementation to affect you with the full impact. I remind you, this is a city. Were between 80 and 90 of all residents and not the port to buy or represent in the city. This is a citywide concern and it is an area concern. I havent heard this addressed. Thank you. Good afternoon, tim colin on behalf of the San Francisco Housing Action coalition and on behalf of our 70 something members. This project was present
I remind you, this is a city. Were between 80 and 90 of all residents and not the port to buy or represent in the city. This is a citywide concern and it is an area concern. I havent heard this addressed. Thank you. Good afternoon, tim colin on behalf of the San Francisco Housing Action coalition and on behalf of our 70 something members. This project was presented to us earlier in the year and to make its a brief as possible, we loved it. Its right in our sweet spot. The urbanism, fantastic, onsite Affordable Housing. Enormous amount of bicycle parking. It is a strong and welcome addition to this evolving neighborhood. I think the benefits of this project are so obvious and so overwhelming im not sure exactly why im here except i fear physical violence from bob if i dont express these views. [laughter] i dont think you should hesitate a second before approving this project. Its wonderful. Good afternoon, commissioners, Danny Campbell with the sheet workers local 104. And i echo that g
Landscape architect so its not just an open space, but part of a network. I think it makes this project exceptional given the open spaces which are all residual little segmentments are fragmented together unless you have somebody who designed it with one stroke. We have that great opportunity and i thought the presentation was exceptional because it spoke about the different experiences, the different conditions under which these spaces all address different needs and all respond to settings of light, shadow, proximity, or even under the freeway. And i think that it was very, very strong feature of this particular design. I am not as much concerned about the exceptions which will not be part of the commissions decision, but i do think that tower separation might not be an issue here partially because we dont have the likelihood of adorning towers or the freeways fall apart in the future, which is a nice idea, but its unlikely to happen in our lifetime. So, i am strongly supportive of t