Less than 60 . And 60 to 90 . And that 90 and overt. Whether you cured by percentage weight or the annex of racial and ethnic fragmentation, weve got to middle segment that that is 50 , whose racial and ethnic identities are activated by racial context as well. So its not just in the south. Theyre sort of a continue on from the Southern States to the central midwestern states, like ohio, going to upper midwestern states like minnesota where it comes from, where my cousin, mary lu, vote solid democratic. Reese is not an issue at the click of a debt in vermont and maine. It is somewhat of an issue in ohio, central midwestern states and the further south you go, the more it becomes an issue both in the southwest and southeast. Thank you. I want to ask a question primarily for David Campbell and colleagues about, i think you were saying the two dimensional alignment that michael talked about was declining over time and attributing it to party queuing and opinion formation. You can see anot
Thousands of years to get us to where we are now. Its not going to change in 22. So we have this snapshot of today of sort of 50 years ago, what was the status of women. And you know we have been charged as this last panel to talk about where we are today. Well, we have got a lot to cover. So, but in preparations for doing this one of the things i did was to go back and listen to that tape of Eleanor Roosevelt and john kennedy. After some pleasantries and this exchange, mrs. Roosevelt says to president kennedy, why arent there more Women Leaders in the United States . I mean we are a privileged country. We are educated women. Why arent there more leaders . And it occurred to me when i was going back through just trying to figure out how we are going to talk about where we are todao be willing to do is to ask like eleanor roosevelroosevel t did, the difficult questions. The questions that you know may be a little bit embarrassing for some people to try to answer, but really are there to
Few minutes explaining some of the implications of all of this. But here i am trying to get across the notion that the data factory benefits from unpaid contributions from lots of people and hear, to give the sense that the data factory is actually selling a whole bunch of services, that most importantly allow the purchases of those services to make money for themselves. But you can see now how powerful the position of these data factories has become. So, here is one example in this is the only example that i will give you of unpaid contributions but think youtube, think yelp and think of a whole bunch of other services and at the same precise thing. Linked in about a year ago started to beef up its content effort and invited different people around the world to contribute content. If these werent ordinary people. Among the contributors are bill gates and the president and other people like jamie dimon, head of jpmorgan. They are all contributing content to linkedin for free. The resul
Thats just my professional constitution. I am hope full often that once i do the research myself and once i go to try to back it up, that i can demonstrate that person was right. But i never take anyones word until ive done my own reporting. Further questions clacks. I just wanted to say i spent an entire night last week reading ninas book cover to cover completely mesmerized and its really hard to mesmerize me especially given who i am and my background and everything. Who are you, maam . Can you tell us who you are . I am senegalese and i have spent a great amount of my life so far on these issues. When i started reading ninas book i was very afraid in my heart was pounding because i could tell how fair she was trying to be. For me its not a matter of jeffrey sachs, its beyond him. Its an entire thinking process of people who never ever would imagine their minds but africa just like anyone else we are no different from anyone else. The only way we will make this is through capitalism
Sometime it is creates tension. Its not always a bad thing. I think you want to see behind the curtain. I think we want transparency as far as what the federal government is doing. And ed certainly has an opinion on it. But its, in fact, there are things going on in your city then your mayor and your police chief or Police Commissioner should know about from the federal government. There should be a regular change. I agree completely. But ed, what commissioner kl kelly has done is expand more than most of the plaid counterterrorism unit of your own. Even do interview say in new jersey, famously enough. Have you learned from that . Do you think you ought to expand your counterterrorism in boston so you doing things normally given to the fbi do . I think as it relates to home grown violent extremists, yes . I think there are people in the community we should be working with and, you know, sort of keeping an eye on. If they pose a threat. That is part of our responsibility is to keep our