mayor london breed trying to score points and not against critics who have been blasting her city is on face. unsafe. because of social media and how people are able to publicize things that are happening in a moment, it is taken complete out of context in terms that is not entirely true. it is sad because i think it is just san francisco has been a target for so long and used as an example because we are innovative, we are creative, we come up with out-of-the-box ideas, and another remember things to push forward change in our community. with the previous president, it was a target. jesse: people are getting fed up with the nonsense. lawrence jones actually went to san francisco to talk to democrats about far left measures that put criminals back on the streets and the voters there say they got tricked. listen. who thought it was a good idea? does anybody support it? apparently the voters did. because it was sold as the safe schools act. come on, who doesn t want
Its all the things that keep this world turning. The gotos that keep us going. The places we cheer. And check in. They all choose the advanced Network Solutions and round the Clock Partnership from Comcast Business. See why Comcast Business powers more Small Businesses than anyone else. Get started for 49. 99 a month plus ask how to get up to an 800 prepaid card. Dont wait call today. Now on the apple app store, android and m taylor. Com Space Shuttle columbia, the final flight premieres sunday at nine on cnn its tuesday, april 2, right now on cnn this morning, bond hosted donald trump coming up with 175 million, has assets are safe for now jose andres, World Central Kitchen Pausing operations in gaza after seven of its workers were killed by an israeli airstrike plus theres a Revolution Happening in our country and its the same kind of thing that happened when my father, which running and 1968 okay. Rfk junior tells cnn why he thinks the country needs a particular kennedy back in the
but this prosecution has tons of other problems. i just want to be very clear about that. let me try that one more time. the government could properly prosecute him for that same or related conduct, yes or no? potentially. i m only asking you under your interpretation of the impeachment judgment clause, is that proper? is that allowed? and i stand on my prior answer. he stands on his prior answer. you may have heard about standing on business. this might be the legal opposite. but finally, you get a yes or some semblance of an answer. meanwhile, you have trump s current lawyer there, contradicting what trump s impeachment lawyers insisted was the reason they shouldn t convict in the senate. and remember, trump s lawyer today not only contradicts that but the lack of the senate conviction is why this case shouldn t happen. it doesn t make sense because it s not supposed to make sense because these are not serious, factual or precedented
called private conduct. and then, emily, i m curious, as we go forward, we ve talked quite a bit in our coverage tonight about what went down, and we had even a trump white house counsel veteran saying that everything, just about everything claimed about that immunity was false. that s not the law and shouldn t be the law. ultimately, once the d.c. circuit is done with this, these three judges could rule, when that s all said and done, it would either go back for jack smith to continue this prosecution or the supreme court could take the case at this early stage and review it on immunity. based on everything that s happened, do you have a view of what s most likely? yeah, it s a great question that s going to matter a whole lot. as we ve talked about a lot on your show, this tactic of delay is donald trump s probably best chance, right. just put the whole thing off. maybe he gets elected president, and he controls the justice department, the case goes away. anything that slows down
and when you were with the fbi and someone being investigated by the doj. what can you tell us about what these meetings are like? anderson, these meetings are really not so much of a conversation or a debate between the two sides as it s really more of an opportunity for the defense team to come in and make a presentation. and typically, they will make maybe legal arguments about attacking the strength of the case and making arguments as to why the case shouldn t be brought, or they may make general interest of justice arguments. it wouldn t be fair or proper to bring a case under these circumstances. doj typically says nothing. they let the defense team make their presentation. at the end of it, they say thank you very much for coming in. we ll consider what you ve told us and we ll get back to you with our decision as to what we re going to do at some point in the future. not surprising to me at all that the defense team left without any real sense of whether or not the indictment