is wrong? i don t think we can give access to data that s protected by law, but we can sit down with him and say but you re allowed to have a phony election? you re allowed to have a phony election, right? no, sir. so, that s the sort of conversation from that call that the judge is likely to be looking at and weighing today, was that something mark meadows was doing as white house chief of staff or helping trump politically separately does this case move and it s going to be quite a litmus test for not just mark meadows for other defendants in the case potentially even donald trump included. katelyn, will we see this all play out, there s been talk about what people will actually see. reporter: we will not see inside the federal courthouse. there are no cameras in court. what we will be able to see are sketches from courtroom sketch artists, that is one big
court. georgia cannot be pardoned away. it s okay if the georgia, case the bigger case takes a little longer i think we re gonna see that jack smith case move like lightning and that will put the federal 1/6 case in the cells of some of the others. how do you see it? i think it s gonna be interesting for a couple of reasons. one, there s overlaps and people have been charged. look at mark meadows, he is not charged. he s not even presumably one of the unnamed coconspirators in the federal indictment out of d.c.. he has been charged down at atlanta. so if you re one of these people who have exposure in both, either as a subject or as a witness, you have to make a calculation on whether or not you re going to cooperate with the authorities, whether it s state authorities, or federal authorities. obviously, if you don t cooperate and trump s elected you could get a pardon for federal crime but you re not gonna get that at the state level. so it will be interesting to see if we have du
hurricane the yearslong investigation of trump shurrican involvement with russians. turns out it was as real as joet mackie s as re girlfriend. well, that s not fair. so is it any wonder that donaldy trump and even recently said that trump could never get a fair trial d.c., which ofo course, could only mean one thing racistul. the washington post , once a newspaper, but now the most populat r among hobos tweetedg o this. formebor president trumpes and governor ron desantis argued trump would not get a fair trialanti in the swamp, adding to a history intertwined with race and, partisan, politics. in other words, the swampy media. so other w desperate to bury tre they can t let that case move out of d.c.. meanwhile, the bidens roll biden merrily alons g with dems wondering whether they ll get away with it. ther e is the weather again. it s always whether or not they lied, whethers or not they bribed, whether or not they moved cash from here to there, ved cash. don t
substantive charge of obstruction, that relates to the january six proceedings. it s a very simple, very eloquent indictment, the same facts are used to support each of those four counts, but smith as we have been discussing is making strong strategic choices here that let the case move forward efficiently, this decision to charge trump alone, it s something else that will help to streamline the proceedings. not about what he said, about what he did. glenn, this indictment does go into detail about things that have been on the date january six. but there is no charge that specifically addresses the violence. is that surprising to? you know, it may not be surprising because i understand why jack smith wants to sidestep and insurrection charge, for example. i will say none of these charged offenses carry with them in the event of conviction,
support each of those four counts, but smith as we ve bip discussing has made strong, strategic choices here to let the case move forward efficiently. this decision to charge alone will help stream line the proceeding. it s not about what he said, it s about what he did. glen, this indictment goes into detail about things that happened on the date january 6th, but there s no charge that specifically addresses the violence. is that surprising to you? you know, it may not be surprising because i understand why jack smith would want to sidestep an insurrection charge, for example. i will say none of the charged offenses carry with them in the event of conviction a ban from future federal office. and an insurrection charge does provide that in the event of