contempt of congress. failure to comply with the subpoena for the january six committee. this is a case of somebody who was inspired, may face some accountability. he faces a maximum of a year in prison. do you think this guilty verdict sends a message to others in trump s orbit who are not cooperating, currently? i do. i think it basically says that you have to play all the january six committee. because i do see some people have more legitimate claims to executive privilege, mark meadows type figures, who the justice department did find to prosecute. and i think that is because they did engage with the committee, had some engagement back and forth with the committee which could see and do that, with the ludicrous claim of executive, privilege three years out of the white house by the time january six rolled around. so it really did not have any legal merit, and that is why you saw this case move forward. you present as a pretty simple case to the jury, and the jury
but i expect that you ll see the case move forward. we will see how it all plays out. michel moore, we appreciate you making the time. hope you had a good thanksgiving. had a great one. great to be with you. thanks. thanks again. we want to thank you for joining us today. i m jessica dean. cnn s alex marpar is picking up after a break. have a great rest of your day.
p.m. today. the maryland transportation authority responsible for this stretch of i-95 between wilmington and baltimore, it says you will have to wait a long time for rask to get good, after 11:00 p.m. tonight. that s late. you might not have traffic but you have a whole bunch of other problems to worry about. pete, you make it sound so attractive. please keep us posted. everyone wants to know if they can get to where they want to quickly and safely. so thank you. here in about 90 minutes, a jury in brunswick, georgia, will resume deliberations in the trial of three men accused of murdering ahmaud arbery. the attorney for one defendant, roddie bryan, said his client was more of a witness than a killer and the video showed the case move ahead. this is the same attorney, mind you, kevin gough, who wanted black pastors banned from the courtroom, who equated them with
hold because of the impending indictment of michael cohen, which has now happened. so what happens? does your case move forward now and do you think that you are going to be able to cross-examine donald trump, because it is not a criminal indictment, and if so where does that lead? so september 10th we ll be making an application in open court to have the stay in our case lifted. and we will then be seeking to have our pending motion which seeks a deposition of michael cohen and donald trump, we ll be seeking to have that ruled on by the judge in los angeles. i believe the likelihood of us getting a deposition of michael cohen is near 100%. and i believe the likelihood of us getting a deposition of donald trump is significantly higher than 50%. and we ll seek to depose each
and i have never seen a federal judge throw it down like that in such purely political terms and say what are you doing? i m not a lawyer so i m not this that world. it was shocking. mary oovly you re a democrat did you think the judge went too far. i m not a lawyer so i don t have obviously that legal expertise but from what i hear and you let me know laura but you can t really assume what a judge ultimately is going to do by what they say. and the kind of comments that they make. i actually believe it s good he did this. because i agree that this should be a very high bar. because at the end of the day if the case if the judge let s the case move forward then the skepticism there is no where to go with the skepticism. if he doesn t then i m sure the mueller investigators will go in another avenue. busy really do believe that the scope has everything to do with financial issues. with the bank issues, the