powerful, and, wealthy can hire more powerful lawyers. i don t think more expensive lawyers always means better lawyers. but sometimes that can intimidate prosecutors, jefferson cases actually great example. where alexander acosta was the federal prosecutor who gave epstein a ridiculously softly, years later came out. and those trump out of the cabinet. i did some research, and i m convinced that the case acosta did that is not because he was paid off, it s because he s intimidated. the legal team was islander show it, and can t, star and all this former federal prosecutors. i think it s a compelling case that acosta just straight-up limped out. president take out these powerhouse lawyers. it s also the points of equal justice under the law. the reality though, i mean it s clear, the more money you have more influence you have been power. the probably the more attachable you are. i think that s right, it s a function of a few. things are system itself as vulnerabilities, too smart
Estado incumple con sentencia de la Corte IDH en caso de María Luisa Acosta
confidencial.com.ni - get the latest breaking news, showbiz & celebrity photos, sport news & rumours, viral videos and top stories from confidencial.com.ni Daily Mail and Mail on Sunday newspapers.
thanks for making time to be here. glad to be here, rachel. i understand you were able to see acosta s press conference and see the materials he handed out. let me ask you about the impression i had as a nonlawyer looking at the materials thinking the nonlegal case acosta is making to justify his position, his actions in the epstein case don t seem to be helped by the material he distributed. here said a couple of things that made sense. that s much shorter and a bunch of things that made no sense at all. the things that made sense is these are hard cases and you want to be sensitive to the victims. that s where the logic ended. right? the state s attorney in florida is 100% right. if alex acosta thought it was not going to be properly handled, he had the complete ability to bring charges
let me ask you about the impression i had as a nonlawyer looking at the materials thinking the nonlegal case acosta is making to justify his position, his actions in the epstein case don t seem to be helped by the material he distributed. here said a couple of things that made sense. that s much shorter and a bunch of things that made no sense at all. the things that made sense is these are hard cases and you want to be sensitive to the victims. that s where the logic ended. right? the state s attorney in florida is 100% right. if alex acosta thought it was not going to be properly handled, he had the complete ability to bring charges federally. they had the draft indictment. he did say that the cases are hard. i will reiterate. they are hard. they had more than 30 minor child victims.