they were here, too, like eugenics, for instance. there was an interchange of ideology. the idea that there was a superior race which hitler took to a grotesque extreme. it was something very popular in america, too. eugenics was not just popular, but mainstream, taught in medical schools, used to determine public policy in corrections, prisons, police. basically there s a hierarchy of races, even though, as ken says, there s one race, the human race. this pseudoscience was ranking people into categories and basically saying white, arian and nordic people are at the top, and cascading down a ladder, and what do you do about that? well, in hitler s hands this became what they called racial hygiene. they wanted to purify their races, their pool, and they took it to an extreme. there was an exchange of ideas
for the military. this is embarrassing. it s humiliating. and yes, it is now in my mind become there were two fights, victor. one is for the survival of ukrainian state as a free minded looks like it s going to happen. the other one is what is the kremlin and that state and this is important, the you know, the wolves or bang and we re seeing protest. there is disgreuntlement in the military. the chechen strong man is out publicly. this does concern me because there is a backed in the corner aspect of this thing. these things are contagious. if it continues this way and you get more and more russians, you just read a cnn report 18 prevention leaders have come out against the regime. this is cascading. this could make the kremlin
the other consistent problem, i think, that we sometimes forget about is that it s episodic. every two years, we have a big election in this country, with domestic extremism, domestic politics become the driving force every two years, because everyone built their hopes up around election, or candidates, or the belief that a former president might run again. so that is, that energy is still there, and i think it s dramatically less than what we saw on january 6th, by the way. but it s still significant enough that anytime that there is some sort of threat of violence, or a federal official, there will be a small percentage of americans around the country, that were already thinking of being violent. the irs is one. there s a long history of threats of violence against tax collection, the irs. what happens, as you have one, two, or three. and if one, two, or three do it, that creates a cascading sort of situation where other people feel empowered that they should do it as well. clint,
threats of violence against tax collection, the irs. what happens, as you have one, two, or three. and if one, two, or three do it, that creates a cascading sort of situation where other people feel empowered that they should do it as well. clint, but then if domestic politics is storing up domestic terrorism, and it s not going away, do we need to get a lot more serious about fixing the problem? we treat domestic terrorism widely different than we do international terrorism, meaning there is no terrorist organization designation. there is no law around terrorism, which means we re more reactive to each of these individual incidents. the fbi, leading those efforts. but it s hard to connect the dots, and it s hard to be preemptive. that comes to social media. some of those posts that you saw right there, you will see a long string of claims of, we need to start a civil war. or we need to act. you saw this with a case in cincinnati, where an individual went and attacked an fbi office
country. they want that to be true. the other consistent problem, i think, that we sometimes forget about is that it s episodic. every two years, we have a big election in this country, with domestic extremism, domestic politics become the driving force every two years, because everyone built their hopes up around election, or candidates, or the belief that a former president might run again. so that is, that energy is still there, and i think it s dramatically less than what we saw on january 6th, by the way. but it s still significant enough that anytime that there is some sort of threat of violence, or a federal official, there will be a small percentage of americans around the country, that were already thinking of being violent. the irs is one. there s a long history of threats of violence against tax collection, the irs. what happens, as you have one, two, or three. and if one, two, or three do it, that creates a cascading sort of situation where other people feel empowered that