joe forced out in 6 hours, son of a b, he believeske a biden was up to no good and hunter was up to no good. take a look. poroshenko rejected the at as the insistence of the then vicea because itidening was investigated his response. there were no complaints noatsoever, problems with how i was performing a pt my job. the reason i oversaw the burisma case was because i wa s the the prosecutor general. the reason that i was handling it was because it deserved a special mention. it was on a list of cases to merit special attention. nted because hunter biden was involved with burisma and of course, his father was vice president joe biden oversawsa ukraine affairs in the white house. my personal conviction is that his this was the case. they were being bribed. the fact tha.g bribt joe biden e away $1 billion in u.s. money
especially in his orbit. our system of justice has now been weaponizet. d beyond belief,ountry and this country is in serious trouble. we re goiniousg to have breakine coverage of this indictment all throughout the hour and developments nt all they happen. but let s begin with harvard law professor alan dershowitz, o who wrote the book get trump and fox news legal analyst gregok g jarrett trial of the century author. well, they got him , it seems,, it professor. you knoweems, we don t have all the charges. we have four of the seven. i d like to gewe have t the spey within the indictment, as i m sure you would . this should be the strongest indictment, the strongest ever brought against either a former president or a potential presidential candidate since richard nixon. if candi this doesn t meet the r the richard nixon test. nixo, member richard nixonic you know, tried to destroy evidence. if this doesn t meet that test, that this is not the strongest case ever. y th then obviously, th
we re going to fight this. you don t have to be joe bidendl and roll over and cooperate with the government. it is no crimer and to be tough and to resist. you have to show that thereve a corrupt motive. and if president trump believes if biden material before he left the white house, then he had no obligatioen to turn themt over to the archives. so agree with greg. this is a civil case that should have been resolved civilly and this better pass a very high standard if we re going to acceptre goingthe administration after i who are running against them. you don t have serious thanst tt is when you have one administration criminalizing the action s of the person who threatens to undo the administration to uo to make sure that merrick garland doesn t hold onto his job. and th doesn te people on top of the justice department don t hold onto their job. you have to have the highest standards. that s why i quote i the nixonn. standard. remember, they went after nixon, not because
on obstruction, there d be no obstruction issue of any kind b not even in anybody s imagination had they not issucriminalize this case. case. this is a document case attacking in case where a president of the united states or a former president faces 100 years in federal prison. pris some of a sick joke on the american people? joe biden says he never toldthea them what to do. joe biden had to sigt n on that becoming a national archives thse to have to go to the department of justice. who does he think he s lyinfg ? the american people. this is a guy that s got the tim documents from the time he was in the u.s. senate. for god sake washe u.s. s, in h. i don t want to hear from the legal analysts that technicalities about false statements and obstructione te. there should never have been a criminal case. crimn of documents. well, what s the on willful retention of documentss th mean? they re trying all these crimess crimes and all thesee
a type of sort of referendum on this criminal case. the in other words, the country would be weighing in based on their votesountryin. i tend to agree with you in terms of timing. now, we know the the new york cas e is scheduled to begin right in the middle of the primary in marchof of nextad year. that s dead set in the middle of primary setmiddle season. you know, the the obvious comparisons, though, jonathan,ea i mean, we ve talked at length about hillary clinton, top secret information on her servers. you talk about a process crime or obstruction aspect ors or the espionage. they would all be applicable, in her case, destructione appli0 33,000 emails, the destruction of devices with hammermails.s. and, you know, i think half the country, if you believe the country is pretty evenly split, is lookinountry ig at ths saying, oh, no, no, reasonable prosecutor would prosecute,